The Oklahoman

EPA set to end clean air policy opposed by fossil fuel interests

- BY MICHAEL BIESECKER

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion announced Thursday it is doing away with a decades-old air emissions policy opposed by fossil fuel companies, a move that environmen­tal groups say will result in more pollution.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency said it was withdrawin­g the “once-in always-in” policy under the Clean Air Act, which dictated how major sources of hazardous air pollutants are regulated. Under the EPA’s new interpreta­tion, such “major sources” as coal-fired power plants can be reclassifi­ed as “area sources” when their emissions fall below mandated limits, subjecting them to differing standards.

Though formal notice of the reversal has not yet been filed, EPA said the policy it has followed since 1995 relied on an incorrect interpreta­tion of the landmark antipollut­ion law.

“This guidance is based on a plain language reading of the statute that is in line with EPA’s guidance for other provisions of the Clean Air Act,” said Bill Wehrum, assistant administra­tor of EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation. “It will reduce regulatory burden for industries and the states, while continuing to ensure stringent and effective controls on hazardous air pollutants.”

Before his confirmati­on by the GOP-dominated Senate in November, Wehrum worked as a lawyer representi­ng fossil fuel and chemical companies. The American Petroleum Institute was among the industry groups that had called for the long-standing policy to be scrapped.

The Clean Air Act defines a “major source” as a one that has the potential to emit 10 tons or more per year of any hazardous air pollutant, or 25 tons per year of any combinatio­n of hazardous air pollutants. For more than 20 years, EPA’s “once-in always-in” required major sources to remain subject to stricter control standards, even if they took steps to reduce their pollution below the threshold.

Praise and derision

Republican­s quickly cheered the move by EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt, especially those from states that produce oil, gas and coal.

“The EPA’s decision today is consistent with President Trump’s agenda to keep America’s air clean and our economy growing,” said Senate Environmen­t Committee Chairman John Barrasso, of Wyoming. “Withdrawal of this policy means manufactur­ers, oil and gas operations, and other types of industrial facilities will have greater incentive to reduce emissions.”

Environmen­talists predicted the change would drasticall­y weaken limits on toxic heavy metals emitted from powerplant smokestack­s.

“This is among the most dangerous actions that the Trump EPA has taken yet against public health,” said John Walke, the director for clean air issues at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Rolling back long-standing protection­s to allow the greatest increase in hazardous air pollutants in our nation’s history is unconscion­able.”

John Coequyt, who leads climate policy initiative­s for the Sierra Club, said the move will lead directly to dirtier air and more deaths.

“Trump and Pruitt are essentiall­y creating a massive loophole that will result in huge amounts of toxic mercury, arsenic and lead being poured into the air we breathe, meaning this change is a threat to anyone who breathes and a benefit only to dangerous corporate polluters,” Coequyt said.

 ?? [AP FILE PHOTO] ?? The Trump administra­tion is doing away with a decades-old air emissions policy opposed by fossil fuel companies, a move that environmen­tal groups say will result in more pollution. The Environmen­tal Protection Agency issued notice Thursday it is...
[AP FILE PHOTO] The Trump administra­tion is doing away with a decades-old air emissions policy opposed by fossil fuel companies, a move that environmen­tal groups say will result in more pollution. The Environmen­tal Protection Agency issued notice Thursday it is...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States