The Oklahoman

Putting swag lamp over tub is not bright idea

- Barry Stone house detective.com To write to Barry Stone, go to www.housedetec­tive.com. ACTION COAST PUBLISHING

DEAR BARRY: The house we are buying has a lamp that hangs by a chain from the ceiling above the master bathtub. Our home inspector says this is dangerous.

We’ve asked the seller to replace it with a convention­al light fixture, one that is fastened to the ceiling, but he insists that the chain is securely attached and will prevent the light from falling into the tub.

The very idea of a swag lamp over a tub is foolhardy, so we are refusing to close escrow until he replaces it. How does this strike you?

— Chelsea

DEAR CHELSEA: A swag lamp over a bathtub is highly irregular and plainly foolish. Most homeowners are wise enough to recognize the obvious impractica­lity and inherent risk of such an installati­on. Your seller is apparently an exception.

Secure attachment of the chain is irrelevant. The problem is not that the fixture could detach from the ceiling. Rather, it is the scene that could ensue if someone standing in the tub were to slip.

The instinctiv­e reaction of someone who loses footing in a tub and is about to fall is to grasp instinctiv­ely for the nearest available object. If that life line happens to be a suspended electrical fixture, the consequenc­es to that person, who is standing in a body of water, could be terminal.

Your insistence on a convention­al ceiling light is understand­able. However, if the seller is unwilling to comply with common sense, you can have the lamp replaced after the close of escrow. The cost of repair may not be sufficient cause to cancel an escrow.

DEAR BARRY: According to the buyer’s home inspector, all of my bedroom windows are too high for fire escape because the sills are 48 inches above the floor. I explained that the house is 20 years old and is not subject to current building codes. But the buyers are demanding that the windows be altered before they'll close escrow. Am I obligated to comply? — Philip

DEAR PHILIP: Safety requiremen­ts for bedroom windows were the same 20 years ago as they are today. The sills should be no higher than 44 inches above the floor.

The 48-inch high sills in your home must have been overlooked by the building inspector at the time of constructi­on. On the other hand, the home could be older than you think and may have been built when 48-inch sills were permissibl­e. To be sure, you should consult the building department for a permit history of the property.

Another considerat­ion is the fact that building codes are subject to the interpreta­tions of local building department­s. They have the discretion­ary authority to wave or vary code enforcemen­t as they deem necessary or appropriat­e.

Therefore, noncomplyi­ng building conditions may actually be legal, having been officially approved at the time of constructi­on. Unfortunat­ely, confirmati­on of such approval is usually not possible after the fact, because written documentat­ion of variances seldom exists.

My advice to the buyers is to accept the windows as a "grandfathe­red," noncomplyi­ng condition. If they prefer new-house conditions, they can make these adjustment­s after the close of escrow, or they can cancel escrow and buy a newer home.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States