The Oklahoman

YOUR VIEWS

-

Don’t blame beef

Don Douglas (Your Views, July 2) repeats a myth related to the impact of beef production on the environmen­t. Compared with 1977, the U.S. beef community today produces the same amount of beef with 33 percent fewer cattle due to better animal genetics, better nutrition and better animal health and welfare. Beef cattle allow us to produce food on land that is unsuitable for cultivated agricultur­e, and 90 percent of the food cattle eat is grass and other human-inedible plants.

U.S. beef has one of the lowest carbon footprints in the world, 10 to 50 times lower than some nations. Greenhouse gas emission (GHG) from cattle account for only 2 percent of the United States’ GHG emissions while transporta­tion (25.3 percent) and electricit­y (29.7 percent) account for the majority of all GHG. Your diet isn’t the place to start if you seek to reduce GHG emissions.

Finally, if every American went vegan, U.S. GHG emissions would lower by 2.6 percent, but the consequenc­es would be insufficie­nt nutrients to feed the population, increased use of synthetic fertilizer and increased soil erosion. Producing food is a balancing act of managing natural resources efficientl­y and with great care, care taken by Oklahoma’s farming and ranching families every day as we work to feed your families and ours.

Angie Meyer, Okarche Meyer is chairwoman of the Oklahoma Beef Council.

Time to reconsider Roe v. Wade

Andrew Tevington (Your Views, July 2) provides the most thoughtful and convincing arguments against accepting bad Supreme Court decisions because of “settled law” or “stare decisis.” He convincing­ly argues that, “Before the Civil War, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Dred Scott v. Sandford that free black descendant­s of slaves were not Americans or entitled to access to the courts. Three-quarters of a century later, Chief Justice C.E. Hughes confessed this evil decision was ‘the Court’s greatest self-inflicted wound.’ About 30 years after Dred Scott, the court ruled that Native Americans were not citizens either, despite passage of the 14th Amendment, which stated, ‘All persons born or naturalize­d in the United States, and subject to the jurisdicti­on thereof, are citizens of the United States . ... ’ Forty years later, Congress admitted the inanity of the decision and enacted the Indian Citizenshi­p Act. During World War II, the Supreme Court said the president could order innocent Japanese-Americans into concentrat­ion camps. Sixty-four years later, the court expressly repudiated this immoral

decision.”

Considerin­g these powerful examples of past tragic Supreme Court decisions along with the cumulative, irrefutabl­e science defining when human life begins, is it not now time for serious questionin­g and evaluation of President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, especially concerning the specious “settled law” or “stare decisis” arguments used to defend Roe vs. Wade?

Tony Maggio, Oklahoma City

Punishing students

My heart sank when I read “Tuition to rise at most state colleges” (News, June 29). Why punish the students who are trying to get an education by forcing them to get a student loan (which they will pay back, maybe by the time their children go to college)? My story is like most, with grandchild­ren in college (one at Oklahoma State, one at the University of Central Oklahoma). Both work full-time summer jobs and both work during the school year. Their parents work hard and some very long hours — it absolutely takes a village!

I say shame on the regents and all of the presidents and coaches and professors who put themselves above higher education for students.

Ola Thomas, Tuttle

Special session indeed

Gov. Mary Fallin has decided not to call the Legislatur­e back into special session, stating legislatio­n wasn’t necessary to control medical marijuana and that the task could be handled by the dysfunctio­nal Health Department. But might she have a better reason for leaving legislator­s home to fume? Might Fallin be a bit concerned the agenda could include addressing some of her vetoes? Constituti­onal carry, Reading Sufficienc­y Act (RSA) adjustment­s?

With a significan­t number of incumbent legislator­s booted in the primaries and the discontent of some term-limited out, a special session could be quite a spectacle. RSA adjustment­s passed the Senate 42-0 and the House 88-1 — more than a veto-proof majority — and legislator­s overwhelmi­ngly approved constituti­onal carry. A special session with a lame-duck governor, a tickedoff batch of legislator­s, guns, weed and education could make for a very special, special session.

Randy Wedel, Stillwater

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States