The Oklahoman

A humorous call for bipartisan­ship

-

CHUCK Schumer, it seems, has quite a sense of humor. In talking with reporters last week about the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, Schumer said this: “We’d much rather follow the bipartisan process … now Republican obstructio­n requires an extraordin­ary response.”

That first line was especially funny — Democrats in the Senate would much rather work arm in arm with Republican­s on the Kavanaugh nomination. This from the man who from the outset has urged his fellow Democrats not to meet with the nominee. (A few have done so anyway, and Schumer plans to follow suit this week — seven weeks after the nomination.)

The “obstructio­n” that has Schumer, D-N.Y., so worked up relates to documents from Kavanaugh’s three years as staff secretary to former President George W. Bush. In that job, Kavanaugh forwarded to the president the work of others in the administra­tion and government. As many have noted, those papers relate to Bush’s decisions, not Kavanaugh’s.

Democrats insist that’s not the case, that instead the documents have the potential to disclose Kavanaugh’s involvemen­t with issues such as warrantles­s wiretappin­g and torture.

Schumer and the rest of his bipartisan brethren are convenient­ly ignoring the fact that when Elena Kagan was nominated to the Supreme Court by former President Barack Obama, the administra­tion turned over zero documents about her time in the Solicitor General’s office. The documents were described as relating to executive branch deliberati­ons on legal issues.

“The staff secretary’s documents are much less relevant to legal matters than those from the SG’s office,” The Wall Street Journal noted in a recent editorial.

Democrats also aren’t happy that documents from Kavanaugh’s time in the White House counsel’s office are being vetted by a former colleague from the Bush administra­tion. But the Obama administra­tion used a similar arrangemen­t during Kagan’s nomination.

Senators wound up reviewing about 173,000 pages on Kagan. The total was roughly 182,000 for Neil Gorsuch, who was confirmed last year. Senators have already been given far more than that on Kavanaugh, with tens of thousands still to come — and, senators have access to the most valuable insight into Kavanaugh’s qualificat­ions, the 300-plus opinions he wrote as a member of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

This isn’t enough for Schumer, who literally is threatenin­g to make a federal case out of the nomination. He has promised to file suit in the coming weeks against the National Archives if it fails to meet the party’s Freedom of Informatio­n Act request. The Archives says there are “several million pages” of documents on Kavanaugh, and that it isn’t able to comply.

All of this is being couched as an effort to ensure transparen­cy. That’s a canard. The goal of Schumer and his bipartisan­ship-loving lieutenant­s is come up with a way — any way — to push Kavanuagh’s confirmati­on hearing past the midterm elections. It’s scheduled to begin Sept. 4. Republican­s should keep it there and work to get this highly qualified nominee to the high court sooner rather than later.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States