The Oklahoman

Kavanaugh fights back, but will it be enough?

- Marc Thiessen

AWASHINGTO­N s the father of two daughters, I want them to live in a world where they are treated with respect and never experience sexual abuse — and if they ever do, they are taken seriously. As the father of two sons, I want them to live in a world where their lives and reputation­s cannot be destroyed by allegation­s without corroborat­ion.

Thursday’s hearing did not add an iota of corroborat­ion to Christine

Blasey Ford’s allegation­s against Brett Kavanaugh. It remains true that none of the people Ford named, man or woman, has confirmed that the gathering in question took place at all, much less that any assault occurred.

The burden of proof is not on Kavanaugh to prove he didn’t do it. He cannot prove a negative. In the United States of America, you are presumed innocent until proven guilty. But apparently not in the United States Senate. Asked before the hearing whether Kavanaugh deserved a presumptio­n of innocence, Senate Minority Leader Chuch Schumer, D-N.Y., said, “There’s no presumptio­n of innocence or guilt when you have a nominee before you.” That is simply un American.

“This confirmati­on process has become a national disgrace,” Kavanaugh declared. He’s right: “The Constituti­on gives the Senate an important role in the confirmati­on process, but you have replaced advice and consent with search and destroy. Since my nomination in July, there’s been a frenzy on the left to come up with something, anything to block my confirmati­on.”

He called out Democratic committee members — like Sen. Cory Booker, N.J., who called him “evil” — and accused them of unleashing the torrent of unfounded allegation­s. “Your words have meaning,” Kavanaugh reminded them. “Millions of Americans listen carefully to you. Given comments like those, is it any surprise that people have been willing to do anything to make any physical threat against my family, to send any violent email to my wife, to make any kind of allegation against me and against my friends? To blow me up and take me down?”

The result, he said, is the “circus” we witnessed in the past 10 days. That is a tragedy, not just for him and for Ford, who, as Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said, is “as much a victim” as Kavanaugh. It is a tragedy for our democracy. Because after watching Kavanaugh be put through the gauntlet of personal destructio­n, good people of both parties will hesitate to answer the call to serve, and, as Kavanaugh said, “I fear that the whole country will reap the whirlwind.”

Taken aback by Kavanaugh’s decision to call them out, and without any actual evidence to discuss, Democrats were reduced to asking Kavanaugh about references to vomiting and flatulence in his high school year book. Seriously? The world’s greatest deliberati­ve body has been reduced to this? As for Democrats’ calls for an FBI investigat­ion, their interest in an investigat­ion is not to get to the truth; it’s to stop Kavanaugh at all costs. If they wanted the bureau to review Ford’s allegation, they should have come forward with that request more than a month ago.

Graham rocked the hearing room when he asked Kavanaugh whether he knew when he met with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Aug. 20 that she had had these allegation­s for 20 days and had recommende­d a lawyer to Ford. The point, as Graham said, is that Democrats only want to drag this out so there is time for more fake accusers to come out of the woodwork. They want to run out the clock until the midterm elections, when they hope to retake the Senate and block Trump from putting anyone on the Supreme Court. And in the process, they want to “destroy this guy’s life,” Graham said.

Regardless of whether he is confirmed, Kavanaugh said, they have already done that. “I’ll never get my reputation back,” Kavanaugh said. “My life is permanentl­y and totally altered.” Whether our democracy is permanentl­y altered depends on whether the Senate rejects this campaign of character assassinat­ion and confirms Kavanaugh. We’ll find out the answer shortly.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States