The Oklahoman

Gene-edited food coming to plate, no regulation included

- BY LYDIA MULVANY Bloomberg

For Pete Zimmerman, a Minnesota farmer, the age of gene-edited foods has arrived. While he couldn’t be happier, the high-tech soybeans he’s now harvesting are at the crux of a long-running debate about a frankenfoo­d future.

Zimmerman is among farmers in three states now harvesting 16,000 acres of DNA-altered soybeans destined to be used in salad dressings, granola bars and fry oil, and sold to consumers early next year. It’s the first commercial­ized crop created with a technique some say could revolution­ize agricultur­e and others fear could carry as-yet unknown peril.

In March, the top U.S. regulator said no new rules or labeling are needed for gene-edited plants since foreign DNA isn’t being inserted, the way traditiona­l geneticall­y modified organisms, or GMOs, are made. Instead, enzymes that act like scissors are used to tweak a plant’s genetic operating system to stop it from producing bad stuff — in this case, polyunsatu­rated fats — or enhance good stuff that’s already there.

While that seems a winwin, “you don’t know what those mutations or rearrangem­ents might do in a plant,” said Michael Hansen, a senior scientist at the Consumers Union. He wants the plants tested for safety before they’re marketed, and clearly labeled once they’re sold.

Tinkering with plant genes could lead to unplanned deletions or complex genetic rearrangem­ents that cause “unintended consequenc­es” within the food chain, he said.

The Trump administra­tion, however, disagrees. In a March 28 statement, Agricultur­e Secretary Sonny Perdue said his department has no plans to regulate new plant varieties developed with gene editing, countering a European Union decision to designate the technique as producing GMO crops.

In his statement, Perdue called gene-editing an “innovative” technique that’s “indistingu­ishable from those developed through traditiona­l breeding methods.”

The end result: Geneedited plants can be developed and marketed in the U.S. much more quickly and at less cost than GMOs that blend DNA from different plant varieties, a highly regulated technique with mandated field trials that can take a decade or more to develop.

That’s allowed the Minnesota-based biotech firm Calyxt Inc. to get its soybeans into the market within five years from the time Dan Voytas, the company’s science chief and co-founder, altered the DNA in a single soybean cell in 2012 using an enzyme called TALEN he helped develop at the University of Minnesota.

 ?? [PHOTO BY EMILIE RICHARDSON, BLOOMBERG] ?? Minnesota farmer Pete Zimmerman is among farmers in three states now harvesting 16,000 acres of DNA-altered soybeans destined to be used in salad dressings, granola bars and fry oil, and sold to consumers early next year.
[PHOTO BY EMILIE RICHARDSON, BLOOMBERG] Minnesota farmer Pete Zimmerman is among farmers in three states now harvesting 16,000 acres of DNA-altered soybeans destined to be used in salad dressings, granola bars and fry oil, and sold to consumers early next year.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States