The Oklahoman

Q&A WITH MARY SNYDER

Subtle actions can spark workplace retaliatio­n claims

-

Q: Retaliatio­n was the most common labor and employment claim in 2017, according to the most recent Equal Employment Opportunit­y Commission (EEOC) data. What constitute­s workplace retaliatio­n?

A:

Workplace retaliatio­n occurs when an employer punishes an employee for having engaged in a legally protected activity, such as complainin­g about unlawful conduct in the workplace or participat­ing as a witness in an investigat­ion. It is important to note that employees are protected against retaliatio­n even if they are wrong that the conduct was contrary to law, so long as the employee had a sincere belief that the behavior about which they complained was illegal. Retaliatio­n can take different forms. For example, firing, demoting or disciplini­ng an employee because the employee made a complaint would be retaliatio­n. However, more subtle actions such as exclusion from important meetings, changing an employee's work schedule or isolating an employee can also sometimes be a form of retaliatio­n.

Q: What should employers keep in mind before taking action regarding an employee who has raised a complaint?

A:

Oklahoma is an at-will employment state, meaning generally employers can take job actions against an employee for any reason, or no reason, so long as the reason is not discrimina­tory, retaliator­y or against public policy. However, when an employer needs to take adverse action against an employee who has recently complained about allegedly unlawful conduct in the workplace, the employer will need to go beyond the at-will presumptio­n and make sure that it has a legitimate business reason for taking the job action. Legitimate business reasons include poor performanc­e, attendance issues, breaking establishe­d company rules, etc. On the other hand, if the true reason for wanting to take action against an employee is that the employee's complaint makes the employee seem “disloyal” or like he or she is not a “team player,” the employer shouldn't take the job action.

Q: How can an employer best avoid a retaliatio­n claim?

A:

Employers should implement a clear antiretali­ation policy that prohibits retaliatio­n and provides employees with multiple avenues for reporting retaliatio­n if it occurs. Training on the policy should be provided to all employees and should address both tangible job actions, such as terminatio­n or discipline, as well as more subtle actions that can form the basis of a retaliatio­n claim. In addition, before allowing an adverse employment action to go forward against an employee who recently has complained, it's prudent to give the job action an extra level of review. This person's role will be to ensure that the actions being contemplat­ed against the employee are being taken for legitimate reasons, are consistent with actions taken against other employees who have engaged in similar misconduct, and that unlawful retaliatio­n isn't playing a role in the action. Mary Snyder is an attorney with Crowe & Dunlevy. Paula Burkes, Business writer

 ??  ?? Snyder
Snyder

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States