The Oklahoman

Startups often lead to merger or acquisitio­n by larger companies

- Scott Meacham Scott Meacham is president and CEO of i2E Inc., a nonprofit corporatio­n that mentors many of the state's technology-based startup companies. i2E receives state appropriat­ions from the Oklahoma Center for the Advancemen­t of Science and Techno

For high-growth startups and their early stage investors, there are two primary paths to longevity and returns — an initial public offering (IPO) or a merger/ acquisitio­n by another (typically larger) company.

MoneyTree reports that in 2018, 86 venture-backed firms held IPOs and 689 venture-backed firms achieved exits via merger and acquisitio­n (M&A). It's worth noting that with 183 exits, the fourth quarter of 2018 hit an all-time M&A record high.

Entreprene­urs must face the reality that when

it comes to exits, no matter how the headlines shout about Uber, Tencent Music or SurveyMonk­ey IPOs, it is far more likely that a successful startup will be acquired than that it will exit via a public offering.

A second reality is that acquisitio­ns of successful startups always will change the deal. Entreprene­urs and startup teams — even wildly successful ones — will like some of the changes more than others.

First, the celebratio­n. Investors will be compensate­d for their risk. The entreprene­ur and other team members, as appropriat­e, will receive a payout of all their hard work — options, shares, cash or perhaps all three.

The acquiring company likely will structure a package of “stay” incentives and benefits. They will want the founder and other mission-critical members of the startup team to ensure a smooth transition for customers and to complete any developmen­t or product-related milestones. The acquiring company will be highly motivated to retain hardto-find technical talent.

However, just as the skills it takes to scale a company are very different from the skills it takes to prove a concept, the skills required to successful­ly integrate a startup into a corporatio­n (no matter how distinct and separate the businesses may appear on the organizati­on chart) are far different from the skills it took to grow the startup into a company that a corporatio­n would buy.

In spite of the financial rewards, it is difficult for many entreprene­urs to move from the freedom and flexibilit­y, and frankly the risk, of a super-charged startup environmen­t into a role where they work for someone else, with more process, more rules and more facts to consider before most decisions can be made.

In my experience, true entreprene­urs tend to want to be entreprene­urs, and that's the really great thing about exits by acquisitio­n. Building a startup and then having it acquired by a larger corporatio­n gives an entreprene­ur a great (but limited) opportunit­y to learn more about business operations — but it isn't dancing lessons for life.

Instead, it is a virtuous cycle.

Acquiring businesses have the deep-bench talent, brand awareness, resources and infrastruc­ture to take the growing startup into new markets faster than either the young company or the corporatio­n could accomplish alone.

Cashed out entreprene­urs have more experience, a track record with investors and the inspiring confidence that uniquely comes from building a successful business from the ground up and creating jobs and returns for employees and investors.

The best acquisitio­ns help entreprene­urs cash out and then become free to go out and start their next companies.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States