The Oklahoman

GOP pressure was long overdue

- Jonah Goldberg Tribune Content Agency

Upon hearing the news that President Trump bowed to pressure from congressio­nal Republican­s and reversed his decision to hold next year's G-7 summit at the Trump National Doral Miami, my immediate response was, “Ah, what might have been.”

No, I'm not wistful about the missed opportunit­y for taxpayers to throw a lifeline to Trump's struggling resort. Rather, I'm a bit misty-eyed about what the last three years might have looked like if Republican­s had shown this kind of spine all along.

There is an interestin­g consensus among the fiercely pro-Trump and anti-Trump forces on the right. For simplicity let's call them Never Trumpers and Always Trumpers. Among the Never Trumper Republican­s, it's a given that Trump is not only unfit for the job but unteachabl­e.

For the Always Trumpers, the Trump they got was the Trump they wanted all along.

In other words, both camps agree that Trump can't change. They only quarrel over whether that is a good thing or bad.

I am much closer to the Never Trumper position on this. I believe “character is destiny,” and waiting for Trump to act “presidenti­al” is like waiting for bears to stop using our woodlands as toilets. Still, I don't think that means Republican­s should take a hands-off approach.

Most of the Always Trumpers who dominate Fox prime time and conservati­ve talk radio voted for Trump not because they liked him but because they disliked Hillary Clinton more (though don't expect them to admit that).

And even though most conservati­ves won't say this to pollsters, in private conversati­ons they will generally acknowledg­e that Trump is often his own worst enemy.

Most conservati­ves try to focus on Trump's results rather than on the president. Republican­s like his judicial appointmen­ts, tax cuts, deregulati­on. And his support for culturewar priorities like the Second Amendment and abortion have also kept conservati­ves on board. They simply tune out the price the party and the country has paid for these “wins.”

But there's a part of the equation that has been forgotten. Thanks in part to the polarized climate, the near-banishment of critical voices from pro-Trump media outlets and the psychologi­cal need to defend the leader of their “side,” conservati­ves forget that many of these wins are the result of Trump's hand having been forced in a political transactio­n. Until Trump launched his hostile takeover of the GOP, he was pro-choice, progun control and utterly unconcerne­d about fidelity to the Constituti­on. He became pro-life and pro-Second Amendment because that was the price of widespread conservati­ve support.

Once elected, however, Trump used his ability to influence his core supporters — who have outsize power in primaries to punish GOP critics. By taking the scalps of politician­s such as former GOP Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, Trump also took the spines of countless others. As a result, the GOP lost control of the House in 2018 and may be on the cusp of losing the Senate and the presidency in 2020.

In a self-pitying tweet over the weekend, the president said he reversed his decision on Doral because “the Hostile Media & their Democrat Partners went CRAZY!”

This is a dangerous admission. Trump's popularity with Republican­s is sustained by the fact he drives the Democrats and media “CRAZY!” His supporters don't want to hear about him caving to the demands of liberals. But admitting the truth would have been worse; too many Republican legislator­s couldn't or wouldn't defend his indefensib­le decision, and they let the president know he'd gone too far. Normal presidents feel constraine­d by the political needs of their party, and it turns out even Trump isn't immune to pressure from his team.

Of course, he feels more constraine­d by GOP congressio­nal support now that he's staring down the barrel of impeachmen­t. But if Trump had cared more about reciprocat­ing the loyalty he so often demands from the party, he might not be looking at impeachmen­t in the first place.

And if the GOP had worked harder at constraini­ng Trump from the beginning, they might not be looking at the implosion of their party.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States