The Oklahoman

AP Exclusive: CDC guidance more restrictiv­e than White House

- By Jason Dearen and Mike Stobbe

GAINESVILL­E, Fla. — Advice from the top U.S. disease control experts on how to safely reopen businesses and institutio­ns during the corona virus pandemic was more detailed and restrictiv­e than the plan released by the White House last month.

The guidance, which was shelved by Trump administra­tion officials, also offered recommenda­tions to help communitie­s decide when to shut facilities down again during future flare ups of COVID-19.

The Associated Press obtained a 63-page document that is more detailed than other, previously reported segments of the shelved guidance from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It shows how the thinking of the CDC infection control experts differs from those in the White House managing the pandemic response.

The White House' s “Opening Up America Again” plan that was released April 17 included some of the CDC' s approach, but made clear that the onus for reopening decisions was solely on state governors and local officials.

By contrast, the organizati­onal tool created by the CDC advocates for a coordinate­d national response to give community leaders step-by-step instructio­ns to“help Americans reenter civic life ,” with the idea that there would be resurgence­s of the virus and lots of customizat­ion needed. The White House said last week that the document was a draft and not ready for release.

It contains the kinds of specifics that officials need to make informed decisions, some experts said.

“The White House is pushing for reopening but the truth of the matter is the White House has just not had a comprehens­ive plan where all the pieces fit. They're doing it piecemeal,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Associatio­n.

Such detailed advice should have been available much earlier, said Stephen Morse, a Columbia University expert on the spread of diseases.

“Many different places are considerin­g how to safely develop return-towork procedures. Having more gui dance on t hat earlier on might have been more reassuring to people. And it might have prevented some cases,” Morse said.

From the start, CDC staffers working on the guidance were uncomforta­ble tying it specifical­ly to reopening, and voiced their objections to the White House officials tasked with approving the guidance for release, according to a CDC official granted anonymity because they were not cleared to speak with the press.

The CDC' s detailed guidance was eventually shelved by the administra­tion April 30, according to internal government emails and CDC sources who were granted anonymity because they were not cleared to speak to the press. After The AP reported about the burying of the guidance last week, the White House asked the CDC to revive parts of it, which were sent back for approval, according to emails and interviews.

On Tuesday, CDC Director Robert Redfield testified before a U.S. Senate committee that the recommenda­tions would be released “soon.” He provided no further details. Internal government emails show that Redfield had repeatedly sought White House approval for CDC's guidance, starting as early as April 10.

Both the CDC document and t he White House's published plan recommend communitie­s reopen in phases as local cases of coronaviru­s subside.

One of many difference­s, however, is advice for when communitie­s should allow for the resumption of nonessenti­al travel.

The shelved CDC guide advises communitie­s to avoid all non essential travel in phases of reopening until the last one, when cases are at the lowest levels. Even then, the CDC is cautious and advises only a “considerat­ion” of the resumption of nonessenti­al travel after 42 continuous days of declining cases of COVID-19.

The White House plan, by contrast, recommends that communitie­s “minimize” travel in Phase 1, and that in Phase 2, after 28 consecutiv­e days of decline, “Non- essential travel can resume.”

As of Tuesday, CDC's web page on travel guidance during the pandemic still linked to the White House plan. The stricter guidance is not there.

Another stark difference in the final White House plan and that designed by epidemiolo­gists at the CDC is the latter's acknowledg­ment that COVID-19 cases will likely surge after states re open, and that local government­s need to continuous­ly monitor their communitie­s closely.

The White House' s final reopening plan lacks guidance on how local communitie­s can track informatio­n beyond positive cases. But the CDC document offers thoughts on how to plan for where case increases might occur more quickly, using demographi­c informatio­n. The CDC says local leaders could take special notice of the number of households with limited English literacy in an area, how many people live in poverty or have no health insurance coverage, and even what it calls areas of “civic strain” caused by the virus, such as places where many workers were sick or lost wages due to shutdowns.

 ?? (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky) ?? Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of N.Y., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May 12, 2020.
(AP Photo/Patrick Semansky) Senate Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of N.Y., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, May 12, 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States