The Oklahoman

Trump opposition throws surveillan­ce-expansion legislatio­n in doubt

- By Eric Tucker and Mary Clare Jalonick

WASHINGTON— Legislatio­n to extend surveillan­ce authoritie­s that the FBI sees as vital in fighting terrorism was thrown in doubt Wednesday as President Donald Trump, the Justice Department and congressio­nal Republican­s all came out in opposition.

The legislatio­n passed the House with bipartisan support in March after Attorney General William Barr negotiated a deal with Republican and Democratic House leaders. But that consensus began to crumble after Trump signaled he would veto the latest version of the bill, which was amended by the Senate.

The Justice Department on

Wednesday announced its opposition to the legislatio­n, including a proposed House amendment that would place restrictio­ns on searches of Americans' internet browsing history. Hours later, House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Cal if ., said it was time to take a “pause” on the legislatio­n.

The Republican criticism could be a fatal blow to the prospects of renewing the surveillan­ce law, as the bill also faces opposition from some Democrats concerned about civil liberties.

The House had been expected to start voting on the legislatio­n Wednesday, but it was unclear how Democratic leaders would move forward. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters that “we will act upon it today, one way or another.”

But the new impasse raised the potential for the surveillan­ce power store main expired indefinite­ly.

Trump, still see thin gov er the Russia investigat­ion, implored all House Republican­s in a Tuesday evening tweet to vote no on the bill “until such time as our Country is able to determine how and why the greatest political, criminal, and subversive scandal in USA history took place!”

The Justice Department said it op poses both the proposed House amendment to restrict internet searches and language added by the Senate earlier this month to boost third-party oversight to protect individual­s in some surveillan­ce cases.

The statement, by Assistant

Attorney General Stephen Boyd, said the latest version of the bill would“weak en national security tools while doing nothing to address the abuses” identified by the Justice Department inspector general in his report on the FBI investigat­ion into ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign. The department urged Trump to veto the legislatio­n.

McCarthy told reporters that the bill won't be signed into law because both the attorney general and the president have questions, so it was time to take a “deep breath.” He said lawmakers passed the bill with bipartisan majorities before and should try again to negotiate a compromise.

“If the Democrats bring this bill up they're just playing politics,” McCarthy said. “And this is not something to play politics with.”

The statements underscore­d the tortuous process Congress has faced in renewing the surveillan­ce powers in the wake of an inspector general report that documented serious errors and mistakes in how the FBI used its authoritie­s during the Russia investigat­ion. Those problems included errors and omissions in applicatio­ns the FBI submitted under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act to monitor a former Trump campaign adviser.

Republican­s have histori cally been hawkish on preserving surveillan­ce powers in the name of national security. But Trump's GOP allies have joined the president over the last year in demanding that any renewal of the FBI's powers be accompanie­d by significan­t new restrictio­ns.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States