The Oklahoman

Tribes, lawmakers, oil industry respond to Creek Nation ruling

- Staff reports

The U. S. Supreme Court decision that the Muscogee (Creek ) Nation reservatio­n was never terminated will have farreachin­g implicatio­ns. Here are some of the statements made Thursday about the longawaite­d decision.

Muscogee (Creek) Nation:

“The Supreme Court today kept the United States' sacred promise to the Muscogee (Creek) Nation of a protected reservatio­n. Today's decision will allow the Nation to honor our ancestors by maintainin­g our establishe­d sovereignt­y and territoria­l boundaries. We will continue to work with federal and state law enforcemen­t agencies to ensure that public safety will be maintained throughout the territoria­l boundaries of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation.”

Chickasaw Nation Gov. Bill Anoatubby:

“Tribal and state law enforcemen­t agencies have worked cooperativ­ely for years to serve and protect our communitie­s. We are accustomed to the unique context of overlappin­g Tribal and State jurisdicti­ons and will continue to work together to ensure public safety and effective law enforcemen­t throughout Oklahoma.”

Cherokee Nation Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr.:

“This ruling does not mean that those who commit crimes on reservatio­n lands will not face justice, no tribe would ever welcome that,

and now we will continue to work with the state of Oklahoma and our federal and tribal partners on legal parameters under the decision today.”

Joint statement of the Five Tribes and Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter:

“The State, the Muscogee (Creek), Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole Nations have made substantia­l progress toward an agreement to present to Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice addressing and resolving any significan­t jurisdicti­onal issues raised by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma.

“The Nations and the State are committed to ensuring that Jimcy McGirt, Patrick Murphy, and all other offenders face justice for the crimes for which they are accused. We have a shared commitment to maintainin­g public safety and long-term economic prosperity for the Nations and Oklahoma.”

Gov. Kevin Stitt:

“I am aware the ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma was handed down this morning by the U.S. Supreme Court. My legal team has been following the case closely and is reviewing the decision carefully. They will advise our team on the case's impact and what action, if any, is needed from our office.”

U. S. Sen. James Lankford:

“The work will continue in the days ahead to clarify a framework for criminal and civil regulatory jurisdicti­on that provides consistenc­y and predictabi­lity for all people living and doing business within the state.”

U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe:

“As we move forward, I have no doubt we can work together with state officials, tribal organizati­ons and the delegation to find a workable solution for everyone that ensures criminals are prosecuted and brought to justice in the most appropriat­e manner.”

Joint statement from all five Oklahomans in the U.S. House of Representa­tives:

“We are reviewing the decision carefully and stand ready to work with both tribal and state officials to ensure stability and consistenc­y in applying law that brings all criminals to justice. Indeed, no criminal is ever exempt or immune from facing justice, and we remain committed to working together to both affirm tribal sovereignt­y and ensure safety and justice for all Oklahomans.”

Washington, D.C., attorney Ian Heath Gershengor­n, the lead attorney before the Supreme Court in both cases who argued that the Creek Nation still exists:

“The Supreme Court reaffirmed today that when the United States makes promises, the courts will keep those promises. Congress persuaded the Creek Nation to walk the Trail of Tears with promises of a reservatio­n — and the Court today correctly recognized that this reservatio­n endures. We — along with our co-counsel Patti Palmer Ghezzi and the Federal Public Defender of the Western District of Oklahoma — are immensely pleased for Jimcy McGirt and Patrick Murphy, whom Oklahoma unlawfully prosecuted for alleged crimes within the Creek reservatio­n.”

Brook A. Simmons, president of the Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma:

“The Petroleum Alliance of Oklahoma is disappoint­ed in today's majority opinion in McGirt v. Oklahoma, but we are moving forward to work with the state of Oklahoma, the tribes and Oklahoma's Congressio­nal delegation to ensure that our members continue to have a stable, predictabl­e regulatory and tax environmen­t consistent with their interests.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Hoskin
Hoskin
 ??  ?? Hill
Hill
 ??  ?? Anoatubby
Anoatubby

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States