The Oklahoman

Are college football players the `guinea pig' for COVID-19 plans?

- By Josh Peter Steve Berkowitz contribute­d to this report.

It was late June, two days before a college football player left home for school and voluntary workouts, when he got a group text message from a teammate who also is his roommate.

He'd just found out he had tested positive for COVID-19.

Had the teammate not disclosed the news, the football player said, he might not have found another place to live while the teammate was infectious and in isolation.

The football coaches, medical staff and athletic director at the school never informed him his teammate had tested positive, said the football player, who spoke to USA TODAY on condition of anonymity and requested the name of the Division I school not be disclosed because he fears reprisal.

While college football players are routinely exposed to serious injury, this year many of them were exposed to COVID-19 more than two months before the general student body was scheduled to return to campus during the coronaviru­s pandemic. The football player who spoke to USA TODAY said he has sickle cell anemia and worries about research that indicates he and other Black people are at greater risk for getting infected.

Karen Weaver, an associate clinical professor of sports management at Drexel, has compared the football players to guinea pigs.

“How else do you look at the first group that comes back to campus as you're trying to figure out what are the stressors in the system?'' said Weaver, a former field hockey head coach at Ohio State. “While I get that any good research study always should have a pilot study before it, these were real human beings. And were they acutely aware of all the different facets of how the enterprise is going to take care of them?

“When you participat­e in a research study, you have to be able to give informed consent. And that's the question, were they able to give informed consent?''

The Ivy League, Patriot League, Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference and Southweste­rn Athletic Conference have canceled fall sports. But the 65 schools competing in the so-called Power 5 conference­s — Atlantic Coast, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeaste­rn — are planning to play despite what Emory University research suggests are comparativ­ely high risks related to COVID-19.

The 14 schools in the Southeaste­rn Conference are located in counties with twice as many COVID- 19 cases per capita than the rest of the country, said Shivani Patel, an assistant professor in Emory's Rollins School of Public Health, who cited data aggregated by t he Emory Health Equity Dashboard.

Collective­ly, t he Power 5 conference schools are in counties where the number of COVID-19 cases per capita are 30% higher than in the rest of the country, according to Patel.

The college football player who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the school for which he plays required him to sign a document before he could begin voluntary workouts. According to a copy of the document viewed by USA TODAY, it states in part that the signee understand­s he may be at higher risk for exposure to COVID-19 because playing football involves close contact with others.

The situation raises questions about the motivation for schools to bring college athletes back to campus several weeks ahead of the general student body, said Charles Clotfelter, an economist at Duke.

“The men and women who are presidents of universiti­es who are otherwise nice, gentle people — they don't kick their dogs — are now bringing some of their students into a potentiall­y harmful situation,'' said Clotfelter, author of“BigTime Sports in American Universiti­es ,'' a critical examinatio­n of commercial­ized sports. “Why might they do that?

“They probably wouldn't do that to 85 randomly picked undergradu­ates. But they are doing it for football. Why is that? And so then you go back to the old Watergate phrase, just follow the money.''

In fiscal 2019, NCAA Division I public-school athletic department­s had just over $11.2 billion in revenue, according to school financial reports compiled by USA TODAY in partnershi­p with Syracuse University' s S. I. Newhouse School of Public Communicat­ions.

College athletes continue to fight for a share of the money that figures to be even more important during the pandemic.

The CARES Act provided $6 billion for U.S. colleges and universiti­es but those schools lost an estimated $8 billion in room-and-board refunds alone when campuses shut down in the spring, said Terry Hartle, senior vice president of government and public affairs at the American Council of Education.

Then there are the expenditur­es necessitat­ed by COVID-19. In June, during a Senate Committee on Health and Education hearing on ways to safely open campuses this fall, Purdue president Mitch Daniels said the school's faculty will lecture from behind Plexiglas screens.

“All this will cost, before we're done, tens of millions of dollars,” Daniels said, noting the school had bought more than a mile of Plexiglass.

Moody's, the business and financial services company, in March downgraded its sector outlook for U.S. higher education to negative from stable due to revenue pressures from the coronaviru­s.

Hartle said the combinatio­n of revenue loss and new expenditur­es has “created a terrible storm for colleges and universiti­es'' and school presidents want to reopen campuses, as safely as they can.

“They have a financial reason to do that,'' he said. “That's where you have all your revenue streams.''

It takes no guesswork to quantify the significan­ce of college football and other collegiate sports for the Power 5 conference­s. The Atlantic Coast, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and Southeaste­rn had more than $2.9 billion in combined revenue for the 2019 fiscal years, according to the conference­s' new federal tax records.

At many schools, managing the return of athletes during the COVID-19 crisis has proved challengin­g. Clemson, winners of two of the past four national football titles, announced in late June that 37 of its players had tested positive.

Clemson announced this week a more conservati­ve plan for reopening this fall just days after disclosing that six more athletes had tested positive for COVID-19. Since returning to Clemson June 1, the school disclosed, it had administer­ed 722 tests and 53 came back positive — a positive rate of 7.3%.

LSU, the reigning national football champion, confirmed in June it had at least 30 players isolated because the players had tested positive for COVID-19 or they had come into contact with someone who had tested positive.

Schools that suspended voluntary workouts after players tested positive for COVID-19 included Boise State, East Carolina, Houston, Idaho State, Kansas, Louisiana Tech, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio State.

“What we're learning from that is that it' s very hard to protect our students in this pandemic,'' said Nancy Zimpher, chancellor emeritus at the State University of New York.

Since college football players returned to campus, 17 Power 5 conference schools have modified their reopening plans, according to the College Crisis Initiative at Davidson College. But Zimpher rejected the idea that college football players have been turned into guinea pigs.

“That diminishes what I believe to be the very cautionary note issued by presidents and athletic directors and coaches to make sure that students are safe,'' she said. “And what happened? When we saw numbers of positive tests, we shut (voluntary workouts) down.''

But Ramogi Huma, founder and president of National College Players Associatio­n — a non-profit group that advocates for college athletes — said he has heard from more than two dozen football players upset about how COVID-19 testing is being handled by their respective schools.

“These players I'm talking to are really angry,'' said Huma, a former UCLA football player. “They are truly, genuinely angry. They're realizing, from their mouth, they're saying, `Our program doesn't care about us.'”

The college football player who spoke to USA TODAY on the condition of anonymity is one of the players who has been in contact with Huma. He also said he is one of 20 to 25 players at his school who are talking about refusing to play this season because of COVID-19 concerns.

“I'm not out here just acting like everything's normal when it's not,'' he said.

 ?? [ALEX HICKS JR./ THE GREENVILLE NEWS] ?? Since the football team returned to Clemson on June 1, the school has administer­ed 722 coronaviru­s tests and 53 came back positive — a positive rate of 7.3%.
[ALEX HICKS JR./ THE GREENVILLE NEWS] Since the football team returned to Clemson on June 1, the school has administer­ed 722 coronaviru­s tests and 53 came back positive — a positive rate of 7.3%.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States