The Oklahoman

One strategy that needs to go

- Rich Lowry (Rich Lowry is on Twitter @RichLowry) KING FEATURES SYNDICATE

This is a poisonous idea that stands out as radical and destructiv­e, even in a year when we have been debating court-packing and defunding the police. The best that can be said for it is that it is almost certainly a nonstarter, which doesn't mean that it won't get more oxygen.

Why limit yourself to the far-fetched when the utterly fantastica­l is an option?

President Donald Trump's challenges of the outcome of the presidenti­al race in several razor-thin battlegrou­nd states are unlikely to succeed.

Faced with this prospect, some allies of the president are advocating, or beginning to whisper about, Republican state legislatur­es taking matters into their own hands and sending slates of Trump electors to Congress regardless of the vote count.

This is a poisonous idea that stands out as radical and destructiv­e, even in a year when we have been debating court-packing and defunding the police. The best that can be said for it is that it is almost certainly a nonstarter, which doesn't mean that it won't get more oxygen.

Donald Trump Jr. has pushed this option and Sen. Lindsey Graham, now bonded to Trump more firmly and completely than he was to the late Sen. John McCain, says “everything should be on the table.” A conservati­ve in the Pennsylvan­ia House, Daryl Metcalfe, has declared, “Our Legislatur­e must be prepared to use all constituti­onal authority to right the wrong.”

We may be one presidenti­al tweet away from this gambit becoming orthodoxy for much of the Republican Party.

There is no doubt that the state legislatur­es have enormous power in this area. Article 2 of the Constituti­on states that “each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislatur­e thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representa­tives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.”

As the book “After the People Vote” notes, the Constituti­on doesn't require a state's electors to be chosen based on the popular vote, but this has been the norm for almost 200 years.

In the Florida vote controvers­y in 2000, the Florida Legislatur­e considered appointing electors when it looked as though, amid all the contention and rival court rulings, that the state might miss the deadline for filing electors.

State legislatur­es acting in the current context would be an extraordin­ary imposition. This scenario presumably involves the courts, first, rejecting Trump's legal challenges because they lack the requisite evidence. So the vote counts in the key states would stay the same and yet the legislatur­es would act anyway.

The Republican­s control the legislatur­es in the key states, and they are subject to pressure from Trump and his supporters, but this would be asking them to defy the will of the people as expressed in a vote that would, by this time, have been litigated and perhaps recounted and audited.

One can only guess that the political reaction against this would be thermonucl­ear. This must be one reason why the Republican leader of the state Senate in Pennsylvan­ia, Jake Corman, has so far been steadfast in saying the legislatur­e is not going down this route.

Any such move would also be subject to litigation likely to end up at the Supreme Court. Even if the power of the legislatur­es is vast, there would be a dispute over whether they can ignore the results of elections that, prior to an unwelcome outcome, were supposed to determine the state's electors.

On top of this, the legislatur­es appointing electors would trigger a historic donnybrook in Congress, which considers objections to electoral ballots under the Electoral Count Act of 1887. If Republican­s weren't united — and certainly a handful of senators, maybe more, would refuse to sign up for this gambit — the party couldn't fend off objections to legislatur­eappointed Trump electors.

A more sensible path is to give the Trump team the time and space to pursue recounts and litigation. Then, if these efforts don't produce reversals of vote counts or evidence of widespread fraud affecting tens of thousands of votes, to urge the president to fold his tent.

That the Electoral College strategy is even being talked about is a sign of weakness, not strength, and desperatio­n is not a good reason to precipitat­e a constituti­onal crisis.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States