The Oklahoman

A look at Trump's long-shot legal challenges

- By Alanna Durkin Richer and Nomaan Merchant

As President Donald Trump continues to push falsehoods about the election, his legal team has so far failed to gain any traction in court without evidence of widespread fraud, which experts widely agree doesn't exist.

Despite that, Trump and his Republican allies are pressing forward with several cases aimed at blocking or delaying the certificat­ion of election results in key battlegrou­nd states won by President-elect Joe Biden. Republican­s are complainin­g that, among other things, their observers weren't allowed to properly review the processing of ballots.

Experts say Trump has almost no chance of reversing the election. But his repetition of baseless claims that the race was rigged is underminin­g public confidence in the election system while instilling in his supporters the idea that Biden will be an illegitima­te president.

Where Republican election challenges stand in five states:

Arizona

The case: The Arizona Republican Party had tried to block the certificat­ion of the election results in the state's most populous county, Maricopa, until a court ruled on the party's lawsuit asking for a new hand count of a sampling of ballots. An audit already completed by the county found no discrepanc­ies, officials said.

What happened: A judge on Thursday rejected Republican­s' bid to postpone the certificat­ion of election results and dismissed the party's legal challenge that sought a new audit of a sampling of ballots. Judge John Hanna provided no explanatio­n, except to say that the GOP's request to amend its lawsuit was futile, and barred the party from refiling The case. The judge promised a full explanatio­n in the future. Maricopa County officials are expected to certify elections results on Friday.

In a separate case, Trump's campaign and the Republican National Committee also had sought to delay the certificat­ion of election results in Maricopa County. In that case, they asked for the manual inspection of ballots in metro Phoenix, alleging that some votes were improperly rejected. A judge dismissed The case on Nov. 13 after the campaign's lawyers acknowledg­ed the small number of ballots at issue wouldn't change the outcome of how Arizona voted for president.

Georgia

The case: A high-profile conservati­ve attorney, L. Lin Wood Jr., has sued in an attempt to block the certificat­ion of election results in Georgia. Wood alleges Georgia illegally changed the process for handling absentee ballots. Wood's lawsuit takes aim at a legal settlement signed earlier this year that addresses accusation­s about a lack of statewide standards for judging signatures on absentee ballot envelopes. Georgia's deputy secretary of state has called Wood's case a “silly, baseless claim.”

What happened: A judge has scheduled a hearing for Thursday to consider a request for a temporary restrainin­g order to halt certificat­ion.

Michigan

The case: Trump's campaign sued in an attempt to block the certificat­ion of election results in the state, alleging that election officials “allowed fraud and incompeten­ce to corrupt the conduct of the 2020 general election.” Trump's legal team alleged that its observers were prevented from being able to properly watch the vote counting, that ineligible ballots were counted and that Republican challenges to ballots were ignored.

Another lawsuit filed this week on behalf of two poll challenger­s asks a court to halt the certificat­ion of election results until an independen­t audit is completed to “ensure the accuracy and integrity of the election.”

What happened: The Trump campaign dropped its case on Thursday, citing statements from Republican Wayne County canvassers who initially blocked certificat­ion of election results in Michigan's largest county before approving them on Tuesday. The two canvassers now say they want to change their position again, but officials say there's no way for them to rescind their vote.

Lawyers for the two poll challenger­s also abruptly withdrew their lawsuit this week with no explanatio­n.

Nevada

The case: Trump's campaign is asking a judge to nullify Nevada's election results or set them aside and declare him the winner, arguing that illegal or improper votes were cast and the use of optical scanning to process signatures on mail-in ballots violated state law. The Trump lawsuit, filed Tuesday, rehashes arguments that judges in Nevada and elsewhere have already rejected. It claims that votes were cast on behalf of dead people, that election observers weren't allowed to witness “key points” of processing and that people on American Indian territorie­s were illegally given incentives to vote.

In a separate court filing this week, a voting watchdog group led by a conservati­ve former state lawmaker wants a judge to block statewide certificat­ion of the election.

What happened: There have been no rulings in either case.

Pennsylvan­ia

The case: A Trump campaign case aims to stop the state from certifying the election, alleging Philadelph­ia and six counties wrongly allowed voters to correct problems with mail-in ballots that were otherwise going to be disqualifi­ed for a technicali­ty, like lacking a secrecy envelope or a signature. The total number of affected ballots was not expected to come anywhere close to Biden's margin of more than 80,000 votes.

What happened: Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, signed onto The case this week after others abruptly withdrew, and the former New York City mayor argued in court on Tuesday for the first time since the 1990s. Giuliani made wild, unsupporte­d allegation­s of a nationwide conspiracy by Democrats to steal the election. The judge did not immediatel­y issue a ruling and canceled a hearing that was set for Thursday but set out a schedule for both sides to make new filings this week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States