The Oklahoman

China fires back at US allegation­s of lack of transparen­cy

-

BEIJING — China fired back at the U.S. on Sunday over allegation­s from the White House that Beijing withheld some informatio­n about the coronaviru­s outbreak from World Health Organizati­on investigat­ors.

In a statement on Saturday, White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said Washington had “deep concerns about the way in which the early findings of the COVID-19 investigat­ion were communicat­ed and questions about the process used to reach them.”

“It is imperative that this report be independen­t, with expert findings free from interventi­on or alteration by the Chinese government,” he said, referring to the WHO mission investigat­ing the origins of the pandemic in the central city of Wuhan, where the coronaviru­s was first detected late in 2019.

“To better understand this pandemic and prepare for the next one, China must make available its data from the earliest days of the outbreak.” Sullivan's statement said.

China responded Sunday with a statement from its Washington Embassy that said the U.S. had already “gravely damaged internatio­nal cooperatio­n on COVID- 19” and was now “pointing fingers at other countries who have been faithfully supporting the WHO and at the WHO itself.”

While it welcomed President Joe Biden's decision to reverse the Trump administra­tion's move to leave the WHO, China hopes the U.S. will “hold itself to the highest standards, take a serious, earnest, transparen­t and responsibl­e attitude, shoulder its rightful responsibi­lity, support the WHO's work with real actions and make due contributi­on to the internatio­nal cooperatio­n on COVID- 19,” the statement said.

Following allegation­s of Chinese withholdin­g of data in The New York Times and other media outlets, investigat­ion team member Peter Daszak tweeted, “This was NOT my experience on@ WHO mission.”

“As lead of animal/ environmen­t working group I found trust & openness w/ my China counterpar­ts. We DID get access to critical new data throughout. We DID increase our understand­ing of likely spillover pathways,” Daszak tweeted.

Another team member, Thea Koelsen Fischer of Denmark, also said that had not been her experience and implied some comments had been misreprese­nted in the media.

“We DID build up a good relationsh­ip in the Chinese/Int Epi-team! Allowing for heated arguments reflects a deep level of engagement in the room. Our quotes are intended ly twisted casting shadows over important scientific work,” Fischer tweeted.

While in Wuhan, Koelsen Fischer said she did not get to see the raw data and had to rely on an analysis of the data that was presented to her. But she said that would be true in most countries.

The British-born Daszak, a zoologist who now works in New York, affirmed Fischer's remarks, tweeting: “It's disappoint­ing to spend time w/ journalist­s explaining key finding so four exhausting month-long work in China, to see our colleagues selectivel­y misquoted to fit a narrative that was prescribed before the work began. Shame on you @ nytimes.”

D as zak had previously worked with the deputy director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhengli, to track down the origins of severe acute respirator­y syndrome, or SARS, which originated in China and led to the 2003 outbreak of the disease. He earlier told The Associated Press that the WHO team enjoyed a greater level of openness than they had anticipate­d, and that they were granted full access to all sites and personnel they requested.

The 10-nation WHO team last week departed Wuhan after nearly a month. It visited markets, hospitals and research centers, including the highly secure Wuhan Institute of Virology that has been the subject of speculatio­n because of its large collection of bat virus specimens.

In their comments while in China, team members said they had some new insights into the origins of the pandemic that has killed more than 2.3 million people, but that major questions are still unanswered.

The mission was intended to be an initial step in the process of understand­ing the origins of the virus, which scientists have posited may have passed to humans through a wild animal, such as a pangolin or bamboo rat.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States