The Oklahoman

Alaska’s vanishing salmon push Yukon River tribes to brink

Crisis is affecting both subsistenc­e fishing, fish processing operations

- Nathan Howard and Gillian Flaccus

STEVENS VILLAGE, Alaska – In a normal year, the smokehouse­s and drying racks that Alaska Natives use to prepare salmon to tide them through the winter would be heavy with fish, the fruits of a summer spent fishing on the Yukon River like generation­s before them.

This year, there are no fish. For the first time in memory, both king and chum salmon have dwindled to almost nothing and the state has banned salmon fishing on the Yukon, even the subsistenc­e harvests that Alaska Natives rely on to fill their freezers and pantries for winter. The remote communitie­s that dot the river and live off its bounty – far from road systems and easy, affordable shopping – are desperate and doubling down on moose and caribou hunts in the waning days of fall.

“Nobody has fish in their freezer right now. Nobody,” said Giovanna Stevens, 38, a member of the Stevens Village tribe who grew up harvesting salmon at her family’s fish camp. “We have to fill that void quickly before winter gets here.”

Opinions on what led to the catastroph­e vary, but those studying it generally agree human-caused climate change is playing a role as the river and the Bering Sea warm, altering the food chain in ways that aren’t yet fully understood. Many believe commercial trawling operations that scoop up wild salmon along with their intended catch, as well as competitio­n from hatchery-raised salmon in the ocean, have compounded global warming’s effects on one of North America’s longest rivers.

The assumption that salmon that aren’t fished make it back to their native river to lay eggs may no longer hold up because of changes in both the ocean and river environmen­ts, said Stephanie

Quinn-Davidson, who has worked on Yukon River salmon issues for a decade and is the Alaska Venture Fund’s program director for fisheries and communitie­s.

King, or chinook, salmon have been in decline for more than a decade, but chum salmon were more plentiful until last year. This year, summer chum numbers plummeted and numbers of fall chum – which travel farther upriver – are dangerousl­y low.

“Everyone wants to know, ‘What is the one smoking gun? What is the one thing we can point to and stop?’ ” she said of the collapse. “People are reluctant to point to climate change because there isn’t a clear solution ... but it’s probably the biggest factor here.”

Many Alaska Native communitie­s are outraged they are paying the price for generation­s of practices beyond their control that have caused climate change – and many feel state and federal authoritie­s aren’t doing enough to bring Indigenous voices to the table. The scarcity has made raw strong emotions about who should have the right to fish in a state that supplies the world with salmon, and underscore­s the powerlessn­ess many Alaska Natives feel as traditiona­l resources dwindle.

The nearly 2,000-mile Yukon River starts in British Columbia and drains an area larger than Texas in both Canada and Alaska as it cuts through the lands of Athabascan, Yup’ik and other tribes.

The crisis is affecting both subsistenc­e fishing in far-flung outposts and fish processing operations that employ tribal members in communitie­s along the lower Yukon and its tributarie­s.

“In the tribal villages, our people are livid. They’re extremely angry that we are getting penalized for what others are doing,” said P.J. Simon, chairman and chief of the Tanana Chiefs Conference, a consortium of 42 tribal villages in the Alaska interior. “As Alaska Natives, we have a right to this resource. We have a right to have a say in how things are drawn up and divvied up.”

More than a half-dozen Alaska Native groups have petitioned for federal aid, and they want the state’s federal delegation to hold a hearing in Alaska on the salmon crisis. The groups also seek federal funding for more collaborat­ive research on effects that ocean changes are having on returning salmon.

Citing the warming ocean, Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy requested a federal disaster declaratio­n for the salmon fishery this month and has helped coordinate airlifts of about 90,000 pounds of fish to needy villages. The salmon crisis is one of the governor’s top priorities, said Rex Rock Jr., Dunleavy’s advisor for rural affairs and Alaska Native economic developmen­t.

That’s done little to appease remote villages that are dependent on salmon to get through winter, when snow paralyzes the landscape and temperatur­es can dip to minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit or lower.

Families traditiona­lly spend the summer at fish camps using nets and fish wheels to snag adult salmon as they migrate inland from the ocean to the place where they hatched so they can spawn. The salmon is prepared for storage a variety of ways: dried for jerky, cut into fillets that are frozen, canned in half-pint jars or preserved in wooden barrels with salt.

Without those options, communitie­s are under intense pressure to find other protein sources. In the Alaska interior, the nearest road system is often dozens of miles away, and it can take hours by boat, snow machine or even airplane to reach a grocery store.

Store-bought food is prohibitiv­ely expensive for many: A gallon of milk can cost nearly $10, and a pound of steak was recently $34 in Kaltag, an interior village about 328 air miles from Fairbanks. A surge in COVID-19 cases that has disproport­ionately hit Alaska Natives has also made many hesitant to venture far from home.

Instead, villages sent out extra hunting parties during the fall moose season and are looking to the upcoming caribou season to meet their needs. Those who can’t hunt themselves rely on others to share their meat.

“We have to watch our people because there will be some who will have no food about midyear,” said Christina Semaken, a 63-year-old grandmothe­r who lives in Kaltag, an Alaska interior town of fewer than 100 people. “We can’t afford to buy that beef or chicken.”

Semaken hopes to fish next year, but whether the salmon will come back remains unknown.

Tribal advocates want more genetic testing on salmon harvested from fishing grounds in Alaska waters to make sure that commercial fisheries aren’t intercepti­ng wild Yukon River salmon. They also want more fish-tracking sonar on the river to ensure an accurate count of the salmon that escape harvest and make it back to the river’s Canadian headwaters.

Yet changes in the ocean itself might ultimately determine the salmon’s fate.

The Bering Sea, where the river meets the ocean, had unpreceden­ted ice loss in recent years, and its water temperatur­es are rising. Those shifts are throwing off the timing of the plankton bloom and the distributi­on of small invertebra­tes that the fish eat, creating potential chaos in the food chain that’s still being studied, said Kate Howard, a fisheries scientist with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Researcher­s have also documented warming temperatur­es in the river that are unhealthy for salmon, she said.

Because salmon spend time in both rivers and the ocean during their unique life cycle, it’s hard to pin down exactly where these rapid environmen­tal changes are most affecting them – but it’s increasing­ly clear that overfishing is not the only culprit, Howard said.

“When you dig into all the available data for Yukon River salmon,” she said, “it’s hard to explain it all unless you consider climate change.”

Alaska Natives, meanwhile, are left scrambling to fill a hole in their diet – and in centuries of tradition built around salmon.

 ?? NATHAN HOWARD/AP ?? Michael Williams scans the shoreline for moose while traveling up the Yukon River on Sept. 14 near Stevens Village, Alaska.
NATHAN HOWARD/AP Michael Williams scans the shoreline for moose while traveling up the Yukon River on Sept. 14 near Stevens Village, Alaska.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States