The Oklahoman

House passes bill to cap insulin

As inflation soars, Dems see political opportunit­y

- Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar

WASHINGTON – The House passed a bill capping the monthly cost of insulin at $35 for insured patients, part of an election-year push by Democrats for price curbs on prescripti­on drugs at a time of rising inflation.

Experts say the legislatio­n, which passed 232-193 Thursday, would provide significant relief for privately insured patients with skimpier plans and for Medicare enrollees facing rising out-of-pocket costs for their insulin. Some could save hundreds of dollars annually, and all insured patients would get the benefit of predictabl­e monthly costs for insulin. The bill would not help the uninsured.

But the Affordable Insulin Now Act will serve as a political vehicle to rally Democrats and force Republican­s who oppose it into uncomforta­ble votes ahead of the midterms. For the legislatio­n to pass Congress, 10 Republican senators would have to vote in favor. Democrats acknowledg­e they don’t have an answer for how that’s going to happen.

“If 10 Republican­s stand between the American people being able to get access to affordable insulin, that’s a good question for 10 Republican­s to answer,” said Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., a cosponsor of the House bill. “Republican­s get diabetes, too. Republican­s die from diabetes.”

Public opinion polls have consistent­ly shown support across party lines for congressio­nal action to limit drug costs.

But Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, RWash., said the legislatio­n is only “a small piece of a larger package around government price controls for prescripti­on drugs.” Critics say the bill would raise premiums and fails to target pharmaceut­ical middlemen seen as contributi­ng to high list prices for insulin.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said Democrats could have a deal on prescripti­on drugs if they drop their bid to authorize Medicare to negotiate prices. “Do Democrats really want to help seniors, or would they rather have the campaign issue?” Grassley said.

The insulin bill, which would take effect in 2023, represents just one provision of a much broader prescripti­on drug package in President Joe Biden’s social and climate legislatio­n.

In addition to a similar $35 cap on insulin, the Biden bill would authorize Medicare to negotiate prices for a range of drugs, including insulin. It would penalize drugmakers who raise prices faster than inflation and overhaul the Medicare prescripti­on drug benefit to limit out-ofpocket costs for enrollees.

Biden’s agenda passed the House only to stall in the Senate because Democrats could not reach consensus. Party leaders haven’t abandoned hope of getting the legislatio­n moving again, and preserving its drug pricing curbs largely intact.

The idea of a $35 monthly cost cap for insulin actually has a bipartisan pedigree. The Trump administra­tion had created a voluntary option for Medicare enrollees to get insulin for $35, and the Biden administra­tion continued it.

In the Senate, Republican Susan Collins of Maine and Democrat Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire are working on a bipartisan insulin bill. Georgia Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock has introduced legislatio­n similar to the House bill, with the support of Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York.

Stung by criticism that Biden’s economic policies spur inflation, Democrats are redoubling efforts to show how they’d help people cope with costs. On Thursday, the Commerce Department reported a key inflation gauge jumped 6.4% in February compared with a year ago, the largest year-over-year rise since January 1982.

But experts say the House bill would not help uninsured people, who face the highest out-of-pocket costs for insulin. Also, people with diabetes often take other medication­s as well as insulin. That’s done to treat the diabetes itself, along with other serious health conditions often associated with the disease. The House legislatio­n would not help with those costs, either. Collins says she’s looking for a way to help uninsured people through her bill.

About 37 million Americans have diabetes, and an estimated 6 million to 7 million use insulin to keep their blood sugars under control. It’s an old drug, refined and improved over the years, that has seen relentless price increases.

Steep list prices don’t reflect the rates insurance plans negotiate with manufactur­ers. But those list prices are used to calculate cost-sharing amounts that patients owe. Patients who can’t afford their insulin reduce or skip doses, a strategy born of desperatio­n, which can lead to complicati­ons and even death.

Economist Sherry Glied of New York University said the market for insulin is a “total disaster” for many patients, particular­ly those with skimpy insurance plans or no insurance.

“This will make private insurance for people with diabetes a much more attractive propositio­n,” said Glied.

 ?? J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP ?? From left, Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., and Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., talk about their support for legislatio­n aimed at capping the price of insulin Thursday in Washington.
J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP From left, Rep. Dan Kildee, D-Mich., House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., Rep. Angie Craig, D-Minn., and Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., talk about their support for legislatio­n aimed at capping the price of insulin Thursday in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States