The Oklahoman

Oklahoma leaders should prioritize state’s investment­s

-

The legislativ­e special session this fall focusing on tax issues came and went without action. But Oklahomans who are concerned about the state’s ability to prosper should remain wary of future attempts to further eliminate state revenue through poorly targeted tax cuts.

Most Oklahomans share a vision for a state in which hard work leads to individual and community well-being; a state that supports growing companies and attracts new ones; a state that promotes and encourages innovation. This version of Oklahoma depends on strong public schools, well-maintained infrastruc­ture, broadband internet in every home, child care to allow more folks to work, and accessible workforce training so all residents can secure good, well-paying jobs.

To create this ideal future, Oklahoma needs robust public investment. Recently, however, some elected officials have called for eliminatin­g the personal income tax, or about one-third of the funding for the shared services that turn this vision into a reality. Rather than cutting our way to the bottom, lawmakers must protect vital revenue and leverage tax dollars to improve quality of life for all Oklahomans.

Becoming a “top 10 state” will require strategic investment­s of the revenue from the personal income tax. For Oklahoma to shine on the national stage, we will need to make sustained investment­s in public education, workforce developmen­t, infrastruc­ture, technologi­cal developmen­t and more.

Oklahoma currently ranks as the 41st worst state for business, but this is decidedly not because of a high tax rate. In fact, Oklahoma ranks third best for the cost of doing business — the measure that accounts for taxes. We also score well (21st) on business friendline­ss, which accounts for regulation and bureaucrac­y.

Our ranking tanks because we score miserably low in other areas: education (48th), technology and innovation (38th), workforce (36th), and economy (30th).

To improve these rankings, state leaders must find ways to increase the number of residents with college degrees or industry certifications, enhance job growth, and better support public education. All of this relies in some way on public investment.

And yet, many state leaders have called for reducing or eliminatin­g the personal income tax, which last year provided $3.4 billion — or about 1 in 3 dollars — for the state’s General Revenue Fund. Without the personal income tax, Oklahoma would have billions less to spend each year on the very public services we need most to be economical­ly competitiv­e and keep our communitie­s safe and healthy.

Replacing that revenue would be virtually impossible. If lawmakers eliminated the personal income tax completely, it would take significant increases in sales taxes, property taxes and taxes on services to offset the amount now collected through the personal income tax.

The other significant hurdle is Oklahoma’s supermajor­ity requiremen­t to raise revenue due to State Question 640. If lawmakers eliminated the personal income tax, it’s likely they would then be unable to pass a bill to replace that lost revenue.

We’ve been down this road before. Oklahoma lawmakers from both political parties have reduced the state’s personal income tax eight times since 2004, most recently in 2021. Simply put, tax cuts simply haven’t given Oklahomans the economic boost we were promised.

If Oklahoma leaders are serious about supporting current and attracting new businesses, choosing to reduce the General Revenue Fund by $3.4 billion without a viable plan to replace that revenue would cause irreparabl­e harm. Without the ability to provide vital shared services, we will see significant harm to the state’s long-term fiscal health and economic growth.

Rather than racing to the bottom, Oklahoma leaders should prioritize investment­s in things that will take us to the top. Sustained investment­s in our people and our communitie­s will support existing Oklahoma entreprene­urs, while attracting new business as well. Cutting the income tax — while perhaps politicall­y helpful for some politician­s — will not.

Emma Morris is the health care and fiscal policy analyst for the Oklahoma Policy Institute.

 ?? ?? A Viewpoints contributo­r says state lawmakers choosing “to reduce the General Revenue Fund by $3.4 billion without a viable plan to replace that revenue would cause irreparabl­e harm.” OKLAHOMAN FILE
A Viewpoints contributo­r says state lawmakers choosing “to reduce the General Revenue Fund by $3.4 billion without a viable plan to replace that revenue would cause irreparabl­e harm.” OKLAHOMAN FILE
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States