The Oklahoman

Commission­er: New jail site needed soon

Says it has to be picked by February for funding

- Jack Money

The clock is ticking on Oklahoma County Commission­ers as they continue to search for a location for the new county jail.

An end-of-2024 deadline to commit $50 million in American Rescue Plan Act dollars set aside to build a mental health facility as part of the project means they realistica­lly need to have a jail location (or at least one for the mental health center) locked down by the end of February, Chairman Brian Maughan believes.

Less pressing, perhaps, is a deadline to use $260 million in bond money approved by voters in 2022 to build the new jail. So far, only $45 million in bonds voters approved have been sold (that happened in March), but ballot language requires the county to have allocated 85% of funds from bond sales within three years of the transactio­n.

The February date for the ARPA funds to be committed is critical.

“When you have every architect, engineer and contractor telling you that there’s just no way they could complete the project by the end of 2026 if you go past that point, that’s what we face, and we will have to decide at some point to fish or cut bait,” Maughan said.

As time passes, commission­ers are pondering where and how to build a new jail that will have generation­al impacts, both for future jail detainees and county commission­ers.

Oklahoma County already carries a bruised and battered reputation attached to the current jail, widely considered to be one of the deadliest in America.

Outside influences emerging after voters approved a $260 million bond issue to build a new jail impacted the county’s options, Maughan believes.

Informal surveys conducted before the election showed plenty of potential locations Oklahoma County could pursue that might serve as a jail location.

But a subsequent real-estate boom took some of those options off the table, Maughan said.

Meanwhile, COVID-19 caused economic disruption­s involving labor and materials that influenced needed services to actually design and build the new building, tightening the length of time Oklahoma County had to find a location that works, Maughan said.

“These were circumstan­ces beyond our control — issues way bigger than us — that changed the dynamics dramatical­ly,” he said.

In mid-2023, a Citizens Bond Oversight Advisory Board formed by commission­ers was given a list of properties submitted by the city of Oklahoma City and landowners to consider as potential locations for a new jail. That list later was trimmed by the board after evaluating proposed sale prices, typographi­cal, environmen­tal and functional concerns.

Ultimately, both the board and county commission­ers settled on land owned by the City of Oklahoma City near Will Rogers World Airport as the new jail’s best location.

The selected site mattered, because one ideally sized would allow Oklahoma County to build a one- or two-story building that would be less expensive to operate and maintain, plus provide detainees better access to natural light, open air and a suite of services related to mental health and addiction issues the current jail doesn’t provide.

The county offered Oklahoma City $2.5 million for the land, but the city rejected the county’s officer after being told by the Federal Aviation Administra­tion that using that land for a jail could jeopardize federal funds that could be used to support the airport’s future growth.

Commission­ers also encountere­d pushback from elected local and state leaders and from property owners near several other proposed locations, prompting them to remove those locations from its list.

Only two properties officially are being considered by Oklahoma County today: One at SE 29 and the Kickapoo Turnpike just west of Choctaw, and unspecified properties within an unincorpor­ated area inside Oklahoma County near where the Oklahoma National Stockyards is located.

Steve Mason, who agreed to lead the citizens oversight advisory board when it was formed after the election, said he knew voters’ support for the bond issue might wane once specific sites were being discussed.

“I knew that building a county jail would be one of the most important projects within this community for decades to come,” Mason said.

“What we learned in this site selection process that started last January, though, is that 90% of the people in this county don’t want a new jail near them, and that is what created the dilemma that puts us where we are today,” Mason said.

While expecting pushback, “I sure didn’t expect we would have the negative pushback we have received on every site,” Mason said.

Jail choices today challenged by perception, commission­ers say

Both Maughan and Commission­er Carrie Blumert said they recognized whatever choice they ultimately make likely will upset neighbors, regardless of where they choose to build. No one wants a jail near where they live or near their children’s schools, they understand.

But both also stress residents need to understand the jail the county wants to build is not the same as what it has today. Commission­er Myles Davidson did not respond to an interview request. Maughan and Blumert expect the new jail will be much more aesthetica­lly pleasing than the current jail, safer for both detainees and the surroundin­g public, and believe some of the ongoing pushback the county is getting is based upon perception­s the public has about the current building.

Both would prefer a location big enough to support the constructi­on of a single- or two-story jail, a design currently preferred by the U.S. Justice Department and jurisdicti­ons across the country.

“I don’t want to have to go back to a high rise or towers. I will fight that as hard as I can, because I think so many of the issues we are dealing with today are tied to the current jail, which frankly, we just can’t fix,” Maughan said.

Beyond the proposed mental health treatment center, the site also needs to be big enough to provide detainees with ample opportunit­ies to exercise outside, plus provide room for detainee interactio­ns with families and attorneys.

Establishi­ng the new jail in a location where it could partner with a new crisis center being built by Oklahoma City through MAPS 4, a new restoratio­n center for addiction treatment services, a relocated/expanded Diversion Hub and the Donahue Center being built by Oklahoma’s Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services all could help Oklahoma County decrease its number of detainees, Blumert said.

“Ninety-nine percent of people I speak with are aware of the current jail and its situation, its poor design. They agree we need a new facility,” Blumert said. “What I try to emphasize is that new facility will look completely different.

“This is a huge opportunit­y for us, one I do not take lightly at all.”

Beyond that, land with minimal environmen­tal issues and access to water, sewer, natural gas, telecommun­ication services and good roads and a nearby highway are important, Maughan said.

Then, there are political hurdles that must be overcome, beginning with two commission­ers agreeing on what location to pursue or to drop from considerat­ion.

“Then we have to ask if the city will zone it — are there five votes on the City Council to approve that? If they can’t see it, then it doesn’t matter how good the site looks to the county,” Maughan said.

A state law forbidding a jail from being located within 1,000 feet of a school is a barrier, as is an opinion from Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna that states Oklahoma County can’t undertake an eminent domain action against another government­al entity to secure a jail location.

“At this stage, I would be surprised to see any location that’s been eliminated come back,” Maughan said.

Commission­ers hope new jail can serve county for decades

Oklahoma County has endured criticism about its current jail practicall­y since it opened in 1991, when design flaws permitting escapes became apparent and later issues involving overcrowdi­ng and safety led to high numbers of detainee deaths over the years.

While elected county leaders make a number of decisions weekly that impact their constituen­ts’ lives, the importance of jail-related decisions seem to transcend most in importance.

Maughan said he has been told county officials in the 1980s hoped to they could build a new jail to replace Oklahoma County’s courthouse facility for the next 25 years.

The current jail has operated for longer than that, with problems for its detainees exacerbate­d over time by overcrowdi­ng and deferred maintenanc­e needs.

What commission­ers build next has to last longer, Maughan said.

“It has to be a functional site. The current jail’s site was not functional from the get-go, and that’s why we have the problems we have with it today,” he said.

“I honestly felt like after the first round of submission­s were made and reviewed by our Citizens Bond Oversight Advisory Board, that we would select a site, buy it and would be done,” Blumert said, saying the site the county offered to buy near the airport turned out “too good to be true.”

Blumert said she shouldn’t have been surprised it would take the county this long, given commission­ers hope to build something today that will serve the community for the next 40-plus years.

Blumert agrees with Maughan that time is growing short, but stopped short of saying a site must be in hand before the end of February.

Commission­ers meet again Wednesday morning.

“We need to move as quickly as possible, as soon as we can. Thankfully, we meet every week, and I am fully prepared to call a special meeting, if one is needed,” Blumert said. “We are trying to do it the right way, best we can, so that people who come after me 20 years from now are not sitting here trying to correct mistakes we might have made.”

Mason agreed the project needs to be done right, rememberin­g a speech that President John F. Kennedy gave at Rice University in 1962 about sending astronauts to the moon.

“Sometimes, we do things that are hard, but we do them because they are necessary,” he recalled Kennedy saying.

Mason described efforts exerted by his committee colleagues, county officials, HOK (selected to design the jail) and the city of Oklahoma City to find a suitable location as herculean.

“We are all working as a team to get this done, and we need everyone encouragin­g and supporting us with the knowledge that it needs to occur ... has to happen,” Mason said.

“This isn’t going to the moon, but this is an important, critical project.”

 ?? ?? Maughan
Maughan
 ?? PROVIDED ?? An illustrati­on shows a look inside the proposed Oklahoma County Jail.
PROVIDED An illustrati­on shows a look inside the proposed Oklahoma County Jail.
 ?? ?? Blumert
Blumert

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States