The Oneida Daily Dispatch (Oneida, NY)

Researcher­s test self-destructin­g moth pest in cabbage patch

-

ALBANY, N.Y. » Researcher­s in a New York cabbage patch are planning the first release on American soil of insects geneticall­y engineered to die before they can reproduce.

It’s a pesticide-free attempt to control invasive diamondbac­k moths, a voracious consumer of cabbage, broccoli and other cruciferou­s crops that’s notorious for its ability to shrug off every new poison in the agricultur­al arsenal.

“It costs $4-5 billion a year globally to manage this pest,” said Anthony Shelton, a Cornell University researcher who’s been studying the species for 40 years. “If you can manage it without using insecticid­es that can affect pollinator­s and other non-target organisms, that’s a real advantage.”

Shelton is doing field tests of gene-altered moths at Cornell’s Agricultur­al Experiment Station in Geneva, 160 miles west of Albany. Those experiment­s began in 2015, but until now were restricted to net-covered plots to keep the moths from straying. Now, he’s awaiting a permit from the U.S. Department of Agricultur­e to release the moths freely in a 10-acre cabbage patch at the research center. He hopes to do that this summer.

The laboratory- bred moths are the creation of biotech firm Oxitec, which deployed similarly modified mosquitoes in Brazil, Panama and the Caribbean in the fight against dengue fever and other diseases. The company hopes to conduct the first U.S. release of the gene-altered mosquitoes in Florida later this year.

The moths have a synthetic “self-limiting” gene that makes their female larvae die before they mature. Lab-bred-males are released to breed with wild females, reducing the population over time by suppressin­g reproducti­on.

“The key is to reduce the number of reproducti­ve females in the next generation,” Oxitec scientist Neil Morrison said.

The work has drawn criticism from organic farming organizati­ons and groups opposed to the use of geneticall­y modified organisms.

In comments to the USDA, Gene-Watch U.K. said more informatio­n is needed on how the protein made by the moth’s synthetic gene could affect wildlife that eats the insects.

Andrianna-Natsoulas, executive director of Northeast Organic Farming Associatio­n of New York, said the group was also concerned about farm workers and consumers who might inadverten­tly ingest dead larvae that might remain on produce. The organizati­on also worries that straying moths could endanger the organic certificat­ion of other farms.

In an environmen­tal assessment, USDA scientists concluded that the proposed field studies are unlikely to have an impact on the environmen­t, wildlife, plants or human health.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion also determined there wouldn’t be a significan­t environmen­tal impact from a proposed release of Oxitec’s gene-altered mosquitoes in Florida.

Previous work to fight insect pests by stopping reproducti­on has used radiation to sterilize males, which are released in large num- bers so wild females breed with them but produce no offspring. That’s been successful in suppressin­g the screw-worm fly, Mexican fruit fly, a cotton bollworm and some other pests. But it was useless with the diamondbac­k moth.

“You could sterilize them, but they couldn’t fly,” which means they couldn’t breed in the wild, said Shelton, who worked on a diamond-back-moth radiation project in 1990.

“Self-limiting” genes are just the latest in a range of diamondbac­k moth control methods that include insecticid­al chemicals as well as predators, parasites and diseases that target the moth, whose caterpilla­r larvae devour plants in the crucifer family.

“They’re getting harder and harder to control, because with climate change, we’re having more generation­s produced every year,” Shelton said. “We knowthat to really have more sustainabl­e control, you need to have many different tools in the toolbox.”

“Self-limiting” genes are just the latest in a range of diamondbac­k mo th control methods that include insecticid­al chemicals aswell as predators, parasites and diseases that target themoth, whose caterpilla­r larvae devour plants in the crucifer family.”

— Anthony Shelton, a Cornell University researcher

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States