The Palm Beach Post

Smaller screens’ rise cues big AT&T deal

Takeover of Time Warner exemplifie­s a shift in power.

- By Meg James and Ryan Faughnder Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — AT&T has worked 140 years to perfect phone service, while Time Warner Inc. has spent decades churning out popular magazines, television shows and movies for the big screen.

But the two companies, which both are laboring to hold onto customers, confront a similar challenge: how to deliver content to younger consumers who are turning away from traditiona­l media.

AT&T’s proposed $84.5 billion takeover of Time Warner is the most dramatic example yet of the shift in the balance of power in Hollywood from the big screen to the small screen. Thanks to the rise of high-speed internet and smartphone­s, consumers increasing­ly are getting their entertainm­ent not from the multiplex or traditiona­l TV outlets — but from the internet and their mobile devices. Advertiser­s also are gravitatin­g to smaller screens.

“This deal further solidifies the fact that mobile is king and content is king,” Peter Brack, a venture partner at the Los Angeles investment firm Mucker Capital and a former Time Warner executive, said Sunday.

T h e p r o p o s e d m e r g e r i s designed to patch weaknesses in both companies’ businesses. For AT&T, growth in mobile phone customers has stalled, and there is more competitio­n than ever, particular­ly from Sprint, Verizon and T-Mobile. The company hopes it will gain an advantage by owning content that will keep users on their mobile phones longer.

AT&T Chief Executive Randall Stephenson, said Saturday: “We believed premium content was always going to win, and it has been true when you think about the big screen, it has been true on the TV screen and we are seeing that it is also true on this mobile screen.”

The mega-merger underscore­s the blurring of lines between technology and entertainm­ent industries, where streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon are aggressive­ly creating their own original programmin­g and Snapchat and Twitter are streaming entertainm­ent content.

Verizon, meanwhile, has loaded up on web content, spending $4.4 billion to buy AOL last year. The phone carrier is in the midst of another deal, worth $4.8 billion, to swallow Yahoo Inc.

For AT&T, buying Time Warner furthers the bet on television it made last year, when the Dallas phone company spent $49 billion to purchase satellite TV service DirecTV. That made AT&T the nation’s largest TV provider with more than 25 million customers.

The Time Warner deal would enable AT&T to diversify its mix of businesses by owning — not just distributi­ng — the channels.

Meanwhile, media companies such as Time Warner face their own set of difficulti­es. Confronted with the threat of lower advertisin­g revenues and declining fees from cable service providers, they are grappling with new ways to reach younger audiences.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States