The Palm Beach Post

Town could reverse vote on trash again

- By Bill DiPaolo Palm Beach Post Staff Writer bdipaolo@pbpost.com Twitter: @Billdipaol­o

JUPITER — Advanced Disposal will get another crack at convincing the town council to award it the $25 million Jupiter trash contract — but residents can’t speak at the meeting.

Saying Waste Management Inc. cheated, Advanced Disposal officials Nov. 18 filed a bid protest with the town. Town Engineer Tom Driscoll agreed Nov. 30 to sustain the protest. That requires the bid protest to go to the town council for an up or down vote.

“(Waste Management) trampled on the spirit of the ordinance,” said Jupiter Town Manager Andy Lukasik.

No date has been set for a council vote, said Lukasik.

If the council upholds the bid protest, the council would vote at the next meeting who gets the trash contract.

If the council denies the bid protest, Waste Management keeps the contract.

No public comment will be allowed at the bid process meeting because the council vote “is in the nature of an appellate argument,” according to town attorney Tom Baird.

The council voted 3-1 at the Nov. 1 initial public hearing to direct staff to prepare an ordinance to replace Waste Management with Advanced Disposal Services Solid Waste Southeast Inc. The Jupiter planning staff recommende­d hiring Advanced Disposal, with one of the main factors that town residents would pay about $1 million less annually — an annual saving of about $50 per residence.

After an intense last-minute campaign by Waste Management — featuring free T-shirts, emails to council members, surveys, $20 Starbucks gift cards to supporters and visits to Jupiter residents — the council voted Nov. 15 at a packed meeting to stick with Waste Management.

“Waste Management very clearly violated the rules,” said Advanced Disposal attorney Neil Schiller. The five-year contract would pay between $20 million to $30 million to the company that gets the contract, estimate town and company officials.

A Waste Management spokespers­on denied any violations of lobbying rules.

“Our small gesture of appreciati­on to our customers is standard business practice. Waste Management followed the rules of the process and any allegation­s otherwise are unfounded,” Dawn McCormick, Waste Management director of communicat­ions and community relations said via e-mail.

Independen­t surveys showed strong support for keeping Waste Management. About 150 residents, many wearing green and red Waste Management T-shirts, packed the Jupiter town council meeting to support Waste Management, she said.

“We ... believe the Town Council was right to recognize the operationa­l deficienci­es of Advanced Disposal’s plan, including 39 percent fewer trucks and 40 percent less manpower. Jupiter residents were equally concerned that ‘you get what you pay for,’ and overwhelmi­ngly voiced their support to keep Waste Management in Jupiter,” McCormick said.

There are about 29,000 residentia­l customers in Jupiter, according to town records. At about $150 per year per customer, Waste Management will collect about $4.4 million annually from residentia­l customers. The contract calls for commercial collection costs to remain the same, about $7.75 per cubic yard.

Advanced Disposal proposed charging $8.45 monthly for residentia­l collection of yard waste, vegetation, trash and recycling.

Houston-based Waste Management was awarded the contract to continue its service at $12.45 per month.

Advanced Disposal could appeal to Palm Beach County Circuit Court if the council voted down the bid protest, said Baird.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States