The Palm Beach Post

GOP divided on new health care plan

- By Alan Fram Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Republican­s seem set to start pushing legislatio­n through Congress reshaping the country’s health care system after seven years of pledging to do so.

But don’t confuse that with GOP unity or assume success is guaranteed. Unresolved disputes over taxes and Medicaid rage within the party, and conservati­ves complainin­g that Republican proposals don’t go far enough could halt efforts to devise a replacemen­t for the Afffffffff­fffordable Care Act — or at least make GOP leaders’ lives diffifficu­lt.

Two House committees — Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means — plan to begin voting Wednesday on their portions of the legi slation. Leaders want to push the package through the House this month and hope the Senate can consider it by Congress’ early April recess.

It’s an ambitious calendar for what could be the year’s most momentous congressio­nal battle.

Repealing President Barack Obama’s 2010 health care overhaul has long been the GOP holy grail. It helped elect President Donald Trump and has driven the Republican agenda in Congress, given GOP offiffice- seekers a rationale for their candidacie­s and fueled countless fundraisin­g appeals.

Yet Republican­s have never rallied behind an alternativ­e and spent years settling for dozens of bills scuttling the law that went nowhere. Now, with a GOP president and party control of the House and Senate, voters expect Republican­s to deliver and party leaders are banking on it.

If you’re a Republican who votes against ‘Obamacare’ repeal, you’re going to have a lot of explaining to do to your constituen­ts,” said Doug Badger, a GOP health care adviser.

There are few hard-line conservati­ves on the t wo committees poised to vote this week, so the panels will likely approve the legislatio­n over unifified Democratic opposition.

Rockier problems loom in the full House and Senate. If 22 House Republican­s or three Senate Republican­s join united Democrats and oppose health legislatio­n, it would fail.

Highlighti­ng an unabated push to inflfluenc­e the legislatio­n, some GOP governors asked lawmakers last weekend to let states choose to continue receiving unlimited federal money to treat all who qualify for Medicaid. Currently, the GOP bill would instead give states set amounts for each Medicaid recipient — a pathway to gradually cutting the federal-state health program for the poor.

It seems counterint­uitive that Congress’ conservati­ves would derail such a major, early priority for Trump and GOP congressio­nal leaders. But they have the numbers and anti-establishm­ent tem- perament to do just that.

Many i n t he c o ns e r v a - tive House Freedom Caucus, which claims around 40 members, oppose the GOP bill’s proposal for tax credits to help pay medical expenses for people not covered at work or through the government. They object that the credit, geared to age and not income, would even go to people who owe no taxes.

They also oppose a prop o s a l by Hous e S p e a ke r Paul Ryan to tax part of the value of expensive employer-provided coverage. That’s an abominatio­n for many Republi c a ns aware t hat about half of Americans get health insurance at work.

“A new plan that actually taxes the very workers that voted for Donald Trump and voted for many of our members is not moving in the right direction,” said Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., who chairs the caucus and contends that the bill lacks the votes to pass.

Across the Capitol, the magic number of three conservati­ve GOP senators — Ted Cruz of Texas, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Utah’s Mike Lee — are causing headaches. They want the GOP to start with a bill Obama vetoed last year that annulled more of his statute than does the current Republican plan.

The legislatio­n remained a work in progress over the we e ke n d , b u t t h e p l a n s would repeal the tax penalties Obama’s statute impose on people who don’t buy insurance and end the federal subsidies most get for purchasing policies on the online exchanges the law created. Taxes on higher-income people, the insurance industry and other health industries that pay for the overhaul’s expansion of coverage to 20 million Americans would be voided.

The measure would expand tax-advantaged health savings accounts and end the overhaul’s requiremen­t that insurers cover 10 specific types of care, like maternity care.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States