The Palm Beach Post

Maine, Utah GOP want Trump to undo monuments

1906 act doesn’t give president power to remove designatio­n.

- By David Sharp Associated Press

PORTLAND, MAINE — Republican leaders in Maine and Utah are asking President Donald Trump to step into uncharted territory and rescind national monument designatio­ns made by his predecesso­r.

The Antiquitie­s Ac t of 1906 doesn’t give the president power to undo a designatio­n, and no president has ever taken such a step. But Trump isn’t like other presidents.

Former President Barack O b a ma u s e d h i s p o we r under the ac t to permanentl­y preserve more land and water using national monument designatio­ns than any other president. The land is generally off limits to timber harvesting, mining and pipelines, and commercial developmen­t.

Obama created the Katahd i n Wo o d s a n d Wa t e r s National Monument in Maine last summer on 87,500 acres of donated forestland. The expanse includes part of the Penobscot River and stunning views of Mount Katahdin, Maine’s tallest mountain.

In Utah, the former president c reated Bears Ears National Monument on 1.3 million acres of land that’s sacred to Native Americans and is home to tens of thousands of archaeolog­ical sites, including ancient cliff dwellings.

Trump’s staff is reviewing those decisions by the O b a ma a d mi n i s t r a t i o n t o d e t e r mi n e e c o n o mi c impacts, whether the law was followed and whether there was appropriat­e consultati­on with local officials, the White House told The Associated Press.

Maine Republican Gov. Paul LePage is opposed to the designatio­n, and says federal ownership could stymie industrial developmen­t; and Republican leaders in Utah contend the monument designatio­n adds another layer of unnecessar­y federal control in a state where there’s already heavy federal ownership.

T h e U t a h L e g i s l a t u r e approved a resolution signed by the governor calling on Trump to rescind the monument there. In Maine, LePage asked the president last week to intervene.

Newly sworn-in Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke has said he’ll fight the sale or transfer of public lands. But he also believes states should be able to weigh in. The National Parks Conservati­on Associatio­n has vowed to sue if Trump, the Interior Department or Congress tries to remove the special designatio­ns.

“Wherever t he a t t a c k comes from, we’re ready to fight, and we know the public is ready to fight if someone comes after our national parks and monuments,” National Parks Conversati­on Associatio­n spokeswoma­n Kristen Brengel said.

In Maine, the prospect of undoing the designatio­n is further complicate­d by deed stipulatio­ns requiring the National Park Service to control the land and a $40 million endowment to support the monument, said Lucas St. Clair, son of Burt’s Bees co-founder Roxanne Quimby, who acquired the land.

Three of the four members of Maine’s congressio­nal delegation want the monument to stand to avoid reopening a divisive debate in towns surroundin­g the property.

“Rather than re-ignite controvers­y in a region that is beginning to heal and move on, I hope we can allow the monument to continue to serve as one important part of a multifacet­ed economic revitaliza­tion strategy which is already underway,” said independen­t Sen. Angus King.

Utah Republican­s, however, appear to be ready for a scrap. Rep. Jason Chaffetz raised the issue when he met with Trump and he asked the House Appropriat­ions Committee to cut funding for the monument.

“Not one elected official in Utah that represents the Bear Ears region supports the designatio­n of a national monument. With the stroke of a pen, President Obama, having never vi sited the area, created a monument the size of Delaware, Rhode Island and Washington, D.C., combined,” he said.

In the region near Maine’s Mount Katahdin, both supporters and many opponents want to see the monument work. They hope it will help revitalize the economy.

Millinocke­t Town Council Chairman Michael Madore once described the park as a “foolish dream.” Now, he says, “We have accepted it as part of our landscape. Until such time as it’s overturned, we’re going to work with the people who’re involved with it to help the local economy.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States