The Palm Beach Post

With North Korea, we do have some cards to play

-

nuclear weapons. Today it has an estimated 10 to 16. By 2020, it could have a hundred. (The British are thought to have 200.)

Hence the crisis. We simply cannot concede to Kim Jong Un the capacity to annihilate American cities.

Some will argue for deterrence. If it held off the Russians and the Chinese for all these years, why not the North Koreans? First, because deterrence, even with a rational adversary like the old Soviet Union, is never a sure thing. We came pretty close to nuclear war in October 1962.

And second, because North Korea’s regime is bizarre in the extreme, a hermit kingdom run by a weird, utterly ruthless and highly erratic god-king.

If not deterrence, then prevention. But how? The best hope is for China to exercise its influence and induce North Korea to give up its programs.

For years, the Chinese made gestures, but never did anything decisive. They have their reasons. It’s not just that they fear a massive influx of refugees if the Kim regime disintegra­tes. It’s also that Pyongyang is a perpetual thorn in the side of the Americans, whereas regime collapse brings South Korea (and thus America) right up to the Yalu River.

So why would the Chinese do our bidding now?

■ They don’t mind tension but they don’t want war.

■ Chinese interests are being significan­tly damaged by the erection of regional missile defenses to counter- act North Korea’s nukes.

■ For China to do nothing risks the return of the American tactical nukes in South Korea, withdrawn in 1991.

■ If the crisis deepens, the possibilit­y arises of South Korea and, most importantl­y, Japan going nuclear themselves. The latter is the ultimate Chinese nightmare.

These are major cards America can play. Our objective should be clear.

Because Beijing has such a strong interest in the current regime, we could sweeten the latter offer by abjuring Korean reunificat­ion. This would not be Germany, where the communist state was absorbed into the West. We would accept an independen­t, but Finlandize­d, North.

We would guarantee a new North Korea would be independen­t but always oriented toward China.

There are deals to be made. They may have to be underpinne­d by demonstrat­ions of American resolve. A preemptive attack on North Korea’s nuclear facilities and missile sites would be too dangerous, as it would almost surely precipitat­e an invasion of South Korea with untold millions of casualties. We might, however, try to shoot down a North Korean missile in midflight to demonstrat­e both our capacity to defend ourselves and the futility of a North Korean missile force that can be neutralize­d technologi­cally.

The Korea crisis is real and growing. But we are not helpless. We have choices. We have assets. It’s time to deploy them.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States