The Palm Beach Post

Shareholde­rs vent at Wells Fargo meeting

- Associated Press

PONTE VEDRA BEACH — Shareholde­rs irritated by the fallout from Wells Fargo’s sales practices scandal sent a warning to the bank’s executives and board, with some directors barely holding onto their jobs Tuesday in what is typically a symbolic vote.

The shareholde­r meeting was the first time Wells Fargo had met collective­ly with its investors since acknowledg­ing last fall that its employees opened up to 2 million bank accounts without getting customers’ authorizat­ion in order to meet unrealisti­c sales quotes.

While all 15 board members kept their positions for another year, four directors received backing of 60 percent or less. That included Chairman Stephen Sanger, who received 56 percent support.

“Well s Far go shareholde­rs today have sent the entire board a clear message of dissatisfa­ction,” Sanger said.

Although shareholde­rs voted everyone in, they were clearly unhappy. All the directors who were at Wells Fargo before the scandal broke got 80 percent or less of shareholde­rs’ votes, based on preliminar­y results. The three who got 99 percent were CEO Tim Sloan —who got his job in October after former CEO John Stumpf departed — and two independen­t directors who started earlier this year. Last year, Wells’ board got approvals from at least 90 percent of shareholde­rs — a common level at big corporatio­ns.

Sanger said he did not see the slim majority as a vote of no confidence in his role as chairman. And he said the board has no plans to replace any members of the board following the vote.

“They didn’t really have desire to replace any one director, but they did want to send a message to the board,” Sanger said.

Wells’ contentiou­s, three-hour long shareholde­r meeting was interrupte­d several times by protesters, with one man, Bruce Marks with the Neighborho­od Assistance Corporatio­n of America, being effectivel­y dragged out by armed security guards. Other protesters were ordered to leave the meeting, escorted by guards but not physically forced to leave.

Shareholde­rs, current and former employees and customers vented their anger, questionin­g how well board members did their jobs and the work of the company’s auditor.

Many employees who spoke were affiliated with the Committee for Better Banks, a union-backed advocacy group, and called for additional investigat­ion into Wells Fargo’s sales practices, or even calling for union organizati­on. Some customers who came to speak pleaded for mortgage relief.

Other shareholde­r proposals related to an additional investigat­ion into the bank’s retail sales practices and other corporate governance issues were also rejected by shareholde­rs.

Since the scandal broke and regulators imposed $185 million in fines last September, the bank has changed the way it pays branch employees, reclaimed promised compensati­on to several executives and apologized to customers. The bank also recently settled a class-action lawsuit to the tune of $142 million related to its sales practices.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States