The Palm Beach Post

Trump has become more convention­al, less of threat

- He writes for the New York Times.

David Brooks

You’ve got to give him credit — President Donald Trump is a lot more adaptable than many of his critics.

Many of them reacted to Trump’s shocking election victory in the fall with the view, which was justified at the time, that Trump represente­d a unique and unpreceden­ted threat to the republic. He was a populist ethnic nationalis­t aiming to drag this country to a very ugly place. He was a crypto-fascist, aiming to undermine every norm and institutio­n of our democracy.

Many of us Trump critics set our outrage level at 11. The Trump threat was virulent, and therefore the response had to be virulent as well.

The problem is that Trump has now changed and many of his critics refuse to recognize the change. He’s not gotten brighter or humbler, but he’s gotten smaller and more convention­al. Many of his critics still react to him every single day at Outrage Level 11, but the Trump threat is at Level 3 or 4.

These days a lot of the criticism seems over the top and credibilit­y destroying. The “resistance movement” still reacts as if atavistic fascism were just at the door, when the real danger is everyday ineptitude.

The Trump threat has become smaller in three ways.

First, it is increasing­ly clear that everything about Trump is less substantia­l than it appears. Trump will be the last president who grew up entirely in the TV age, post-print but pre-internet. In the Trump mental framework, everything exists in segments and episodes. Ratings are the ultimate criteria of value.

Second, Trump’s competency level has risen from catastroph­ic to merely inadequate. In the first few weeks, Trump was shooting himself in the foot on an hourly basis. But as time has gone by, he has hired better people and has shifted power within the White House to those who are trying to at least build a normal decision-making process.

Third, Trump has detached himself from the only truly revolution­ary movement of our time. If the world order is going to really be disrupted, it will be because a U.S. president taps into the anger seething among the globe’s rural working classes. It will be because the U.S. leads a coalition of the global populist strongmen.

Trump seemed inclined to do that a few months ago, but not today. His administra­tion-defining motif now is being pro-business — lightening regulation­s, embracing the Export-Import Bank and offering to lower corporate taxes.

Parts of the Trump economic policy agenda are pretty good — corporate tax rates are indeed too high. Parts are pretty bad — threatenin­g the Paris accords on global warming. But there’s nothing unusual. It looks like any Republican administra­tion that is staffed by people whose prejudices were formed in 1984.

Far from being a fighter, Trump tends to back off when his plans face resistance, like during this week’s budget showdown. He’ll never be deep, because of his TV-shaped attention span, but the style of his superficia­lity is likely to change radically over the next few years.

Don’t get me wrong. I wish we had a president who had actual conviction­s and knowledge, and who was interested in delivering real good to real Americans. But it’s hard to maintain outrage at a man who is a political pond skater — one of those little creatures that flit across the surface, sort of fascinatin­g to watch, but have little effect as they go.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States