The Palm Beach Post

H-bombs, more formally called thermonucl­ear devices, date to the 1950s and have the potential to be far stronger than simpler fission bombs like those used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States at the end of World War II.

-

actually tested.

“With luck, reports of a collapse of the (testing) tunnel may mean there is some venting, which would give useful informatio­n,” Wright said.

David Albright, a former U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq and founder of the Institute for Science and Internatio­nal Security, said he also remains unconvince­d that the North has an H-bomb, or that it detonated one Sunday.

“North Korea understand­s our fears and I believe the object in the picture was a model meant to play on those fears, sow division, and bolster their deterrent,” he said.

Even so, he said North Korea could well be seeking to develop two-stage weapons because their explosive yield can be much higher than other designs; the requiremen­t for fissile material is less; and their elongated shape can potentiall­y fit more easily into missile re-entry vehicles.

“I think North Korea needs more tests and time to develop a miniaturiz­ed two-stage thermonucl­ear weapon,” he said. Still, he said Sunday’s test has prompted him to move up his estimate of when it will have such a weapon, which he now puts at less than two years away.

Other experts were more willing to guardedly accept the North’s H-bomb claim.

“Their statements about missile and nuclear tests have become increasing­ly detailed, precise, and credible,” said Joshua Pollack, a senior research associate at the Middlebury Institute of Internatio­nal Studies in Monterey, Calif. “They’ve shown us more and more details in the process . ... So context alone suggests they’re telling the truth about this.”

Though the superpower­s conducted them with alarming frequency in the 1950s and ’60s, North Korea is the only country in the world tha t still carries out undergroun­d nuclear tests.

Its first was something of a fizzle, with an explosion that was only about 1 kiloton. The second, three years later, was much bigger, fixed some of the problems with the first device and set the stage for a more ambitious test in 2013, which was the first ordered by Kim Jong Un. The fourth and fifth tests were both conducted last year, with what the North claimed was its first H-bomb in January and then a more powerful device in September.

Pollack believes there could be more — possibly many more — undergroun­d tests ahead.

“New designs and major new features can always use testing. The U.S. did it over 1,000 times! Plus, it’s a stick in the eyes of the U.S.”

He noted the North has four tunnel openings in four mountains at its Punggye-ri test site. The first tunnel was abandoned after just one use, probably because gases leaked and authoritie­s realized the geology there was unfavorabl­e. They conducted their next five tests, including Sunday’s, at the second mountain. The others remain unused.

Albright, the former arms inspector, estimates North Korea needs about 2 kilograms of plutonium and 6 to 10 kilograms of weapons-grade uranium to achieve a composite core bomb with a 10-kiloton yield. Based on its known production capabiliti­es, he said, it has about 33 kilograms of separated plutonium and 175 to 645 kilograms of weapons-grade uranium.

That’s not enough for a vast nuclear arsenal, but it is enough to steadily expand the arsenal and conduct many more blasts at Punggye-ri.

“I do expect more tests in the absence of any serious dialogue with the U.S.,” Pollack said, “although one might say that this is a form of dialogue.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States