The Palm Beach Post

Bill would ban pro stadiums on public land

Panel approves measure, which moves to full House.

- By Jim Turner

TALLAHASSE­E — A ban on profession­al sports franchises building or renovating stadiums on publicly owned land is ready to go to the full Florida House, after speeding through only one committee in advance of the 2018 legislativ­e session.

The House Government Accountabi­lity Committee on Tuesday voted 15-6 to approve the measure (HB 13), which would also prohibit the state or local government­s from leasing existing facilities to sports franchises below fair market value.

“What this bill aims to do is to try to curtail abuses that have gone on, where cities ... are being held hostage,” said Rep. Manny Diaz Jr., a Hialeah Republican and co-sponsor.

Opposition to stadium funding has steadily grown in the Legislatur­e since a 2009 deal by Miami-Dade County to borrow about $400 million through bonds for Marlins Stadium. The deal, according to projection­s, may cost more than $2.4 billion when the final payment is due in 2048.

Diaz said taxpayer funding helped bolster the recent completion of a $1.2 billion sale of Major League Baseball’s Miami Marlins by Jeffrey Loria.

“That team, that owner that just sold, purchased that team for pennies on the dollar — with a loan from Major League Baseball — and came down to Miami-Dade County and was able to build a stadium using taxpayer dollars that basically is what created the equity in that team,” Diaz said. “He’s walking away probably with you know $700 (million) to $800 million at the cost of the pockets of the taxpayers.”

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Miami Heat, Orlando Magic, Tampa Bay Lightning, Florida Panthers, Miami Marlins, Jacksonvil­le Jaguars and Tampa Bay Rays play in stadiums on publicly owned land. Also, publicly owned land is used for all but one of the state’s Major League Baseball spring-training facilities.

The House supported a similar bill during the 2017 legislativ­e session. The new bill will go to the House floor in the 2018 session, which starts in January. But again, the proposal’s future will depend on the Senate, which has been cool to the measure.

Most bills go through more than one committee before advancing to the House or Senate floors. The fast-tracking of the stadium bill is emblematic of House leaders’ opposition to using public dollars for private ventures. House and Senate leaders have clashed on issues such as business incentives and tourism marketing.

Opponents contend the stadium bill may be too broad and infringe on the rights of local government­s.

“This Legislatur­e has gone too far in attacking home rule,” said Rep. Jay Fant, a Jacksonvil­le Republican and candidate for attorney general who voted against the bill.

A Senate version of the bill (SB 352) has been filed for the 2018 session by Sen. Rene Garcia R-Hialeah. Garcia filed a similar bill in the 2017 session, but it failed to get through committees.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States