The Palm Beach Post

Exxon settles air pollution case

- By David Koenig

Exxon Mobil settled air pollution violations with the Trump administra­tion by paying a $2.5 million civil penalty and promising to spend $300 million on pollution-control technology at several plants along the Gulf Coast.

Federal officials said Tuesday that the settlement will prevent thousands of tons of future pollution, including cancer-causing benzene, from eight petrochemi­cal plants in Texas and Louisiana.

Some environmen­talists attacked the settlement as insufficie­nt punishment for years of violations by the giant oil company, while others said it addressed excess burning or flaring of gas, a key pollution problem at Exxon plants.

The deal settles allegation­s that Exxon violated the federal Clean Air Act by releasing excess harmful pollution after modifying flaring systems at five plants in Texas and three in Louisiana. The allegation­s date back more than a decade.

Exxon said it will install and increase efficiency of the flaring systems and monitor for benzene outside four of the plants.

The Justice Department and the state of Colorado announced a smaller settlement over pollution charges against Denver-based PDC Energy Inc. The company will spend about $20 million to upgrade equipment and pay a $2.5 million civil penalty to the federal government and Colorado. Up to $1 million of the state’s share can be forgiven if the company performs certain environmen­tal projects.

Patrick Traylor, hired by new EPA Administra­tor Scott Pruitt, said the settlement­s show that the Trump administra­tion will enforce environmen­tal laws “with prudence and with excellence.”

Traylor said the deals bring “two very well-respected companies” back into compliance with environmen­tal laws. “Now they can continue their work of driving economic growth,” he said.

Environmen­talists said the civil penalty against Exxon was far too small given the duration and seriousnes­s of the violations of the federal Clean Air Act.

“The fossil-fueled Trump administra­tion is letting ExxonMobil off the hook with a slap of the wrist,” said Lindsay Meiman of 350.org, an environmen­tal group that emphasizes lower emissions of greenhouse gases. She said the deal would embolden Exxon and other companies to continue to pollute.

However, the director of a group that successful­ly sued Exxon praised the deal — even while calling the $2.5 million penalty “weak” — because it forced Exxon to spend $300 million on reducing pollution.

“This enforcemen­t case was in the works for many, many years” before the Trump administra­tion, said Luke Metzger of Environmen­t Texas. “It’s a very good settlement” that addresses issues his group raised in a lawsuit over Exxon’s refinery complex in Baytown, Texas, including excessive flaring of natural gas.

In April, a federal judge ordered Exxon to pay the government nearly $20 million after Environmen­t Texas and the Sierra Club sued over the release of tons of pollutants at Baytown. Exxon is appealing the ruling.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States