The Palm Beach Post

Senate GOP tax bill delays corporate cut

Deduction for mortgage interest left intact; state, local tax deductions out.

- By Andrew Taylor and Marcy Gordon

WASHINGTON — Senate Republican­s revealed the details of their sweeping tax legislatio­n Thursday, including a one-year delay in plans for a major corporate tax cut despite strident opposition from the White House and others in their own party. Their bill would leave the prized mortgage interest deduction untouched for homeowners in a concession to the powerful real estate lobby but would ignore a House compromise on the hot-button issue of state and local tax deductions.

On the other side of the Capitol, the House Ways and Means Committee approved its own version of the legislatio­n on a party-line 24-16 vote, amid intense political pressure on the GOP to push forward on the first major rewrite of the U.S. tax code in three decades. It’s President Donald Trump’s top priority and a goal many Republican­s believe has grown even more urgent in the wake of election losses Tuesday that displayed an energized Democratic electorate.

Yet, as the Senate Finance Committee unveiled its bill, a few stark difference­s emerged with the version approved by the House tax-writing committee, underscori­ng the challenges ahead in getting both chambers to agree on the complex and far-reaching legislatio­n that would affect nearly every American.

Democrats are strongly opposed to the GOP rewrite, so the Republican­s must find agreement among

themselves to have any hope of passage.

The Senate bill would fully repeal the state and local deduction claimed by many taxpayers, an idea that has drawn vigorous opposition from House Republican­s in New York and New Jersey and resulted in a compromise in the House version of the bill that would allow property taxes to be deducted up to $10,000.

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said that the Senate’s total-repeal approach would face tough sledding in his chamber. As for the hard-fought compromise, he said, “I think it’d be difficult not to have it in the final bill.”

On the other hand, the House bill would cap the mortgage interest deduction, an idea that caused intense blowback from the real estate lobby, but the Senate tax measure would leave it unchanged. That means homebuyers would continue to be able to deduct interest payments on loans of up to $1 million as permitted under current law; the House bill would reduce the limit to $500,000.

In a change sure to cause a major dispute, the Senate measure includes a one-year delay in lowering the corporate tax rate, which is to be cut from 35 percent to 20 percent. Delaying that reduction would lower the cost of the bill to the Treasury, but the delay is opposed by the White House and some Senate Republican­s.

“The president would like this to go into effect right away,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said Thursday on Fox Business Network.

Sen. David Perdue, R-Ga., told reporters late Wednesday he had argued against any delay in the tax help for businesses, saying “that’s nothing but a Washington gimmick. This is about getting the economy going. The sooner we get this in place, the better we are.”

The feverish efforts by Republican­s in both chambers Thursday were aimed at fulfilling a self-imposed deadline to get legislatio­n out of the House and Senate before Thanksgivi­ng, so that the period between Thanksgivi­ng and Christmas could be devoted to reconcilin­g the two versions. But the Senate already seemed unlikely to meet that deadline because of complex rules governing how it must consider the tax bill.

The House and Senate bills are broadly similar in their general outlines. Both would drasticall­y reduce the corporate tax rate and also lower rates for individual­s, while eliminatin­g deductions claimed by many people.

The House version would collapse the current seven tax brackets into four, while the Senate would retain seven. The House bill would entirely eliminate the estate tax, while the Senate version would retain it while doubling the exemption level. Both versions would retain an adoption tax credit that had initially been eliminated in the House bill, but that adoption advocates fought to restore.

Both would increase a child tax credit, though not to levels sought by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and others, an indication of how individual provisions will need to be negotiated with one lawmaker after another in the weeks to come. House Republican­s appear on track to pass their version of the bill next week, but in the Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has a slim 52-48 majority that has proven difficult to corral.

Democrats are angrily opposed to the GOP rewrite, arguing it’s a giveaway to the rich and corporate America. Republican­s contend that the tax reductions will help the middle class, even though some independen­t analyses have found that the wealthy and corporatio­ns benefit disproport­ionately.

The tax bill must deepen federal deficits by no more than $1.5 trillion over the coming decade. If Republican­s don’t meet that, the measure would be vulnerable to a bill-killing Senate filibuster by Democrats that GOP senators lack the votes to block. It also cannot add to red ink beyond the first 10 years without facing the same fate.

 ?? MARK WILSON / GETTY IMAGES ?? Chairman Kevin Brady (center), R-Texas, talks with Rep. John Larson (left), D-Conn., and Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., during a Ways and Means Committee markup of the GOP tax bill.
MARK WILSON / GETTY IMAGES Chairman Kevin Brady (center), R-Texas, talks with Rep. John Larson (left), D-Conn., and Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., during a Ways and Means Committee markup of the GOP tax bill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States