The Palm Beach Post

What the Moore case says about our siege mentality

-

Why are so many conservati­ve evangelica­ls in Alabama still supporting Roy Moore? For that matter, why have so many evangelica­ls around the country spent the past two years embracing Donald Trump?

I just took part in a compelling conversati­on on this subject at the Faith Angle Forum, founded by the late Michael Cromartie of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, and came away with one core explanatio­n: the siege mentality. In fact, I’d say the siege mentality explains most of the dysfunctio­nal group behavior these days, on left and right.

You see the siege mentality not just among evangelica­l Christians but also among the campus social justice warriors and the gun lobbyists, in North Korea and Iran, and in the populist movements across Europe.

The siege mentality starts with a sense of collective victimhood. It’s not just that our group has opponents. The whole “culture” or the whole world is hostile.

From this flows a sense of pessimism. Things are bad now. Our enemies are growing stronger. And things are about to get worse. The world our children inherit will be horrific.

In the end, though, the siege mentality ends up being self-destructiv­e. Groups smitten with the siege mentality filter out discordant facts and become more extreme versions of themselves, leading to further marginaliz­ation. They take mainstream loathing as a badge of honor and wind up taking pleasure in their most unattracti­ve instincts.

Why is this mind-set so prevalent? It’s partially because the country is divided and groups feel under assault. According to a Pew Research Center poll, 64 percent of Americans believe their group has been losing most of the time.

But that’s not the main reason the siege mentality is so prevalent. It’s because we’re in a historic transition­al moment, and the very foundation­s of society are open to question.

In the 1960s, the civil rights leaders suffered injustice and oppression. But they had a faith in the foundation­s of society. They wanted a place at the table.

Today, people are more likely to think the table itself stinks, or there is no common table. Christians are more likely to argue that the liberal order itself is intolerant toward faith. Social justice warriors are prone to argue that America is racist and oppressive. The evil is inherent in the basic structure.

How should one respond to the siege mentality, to the Alabamians now rallying around Roy Moore? Well, it’s right to be disgusted, and it feels good to be contemptuo­us. But contempt only breeds contempt.

It should be met with confident pluralism. We have a shared moral culture, and some things are beyond the boundaries, like tolerating sexual harassment.

Suppose America’s leaders had gone to conservati­ve evangelica­ls a decade ago and said: Look, we understand that changing attitudes about gay marriage put you in a tough position. We’re not going to stop doing what we think is right, but we’re going to try to work out some accommodat­ion with you on religious liberty so you can feel at home here and practice your faith.

That might have felt more like a conversati­on than a siege. That might have spared us the populist revolts that brought us Roy Moore, and Donald Trump, and the repugnant habits of mind that now excuse them.

 ?? David Brooks He writes for the New York Times. ??
David Brooks He writes for the New York Times.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States