The Palm Beach Post

Unflinchin­g scold Sanders is just what Trump ordered

- Kathleen Parker

When White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders asked the press corps Monday to preface their daily briefing questions with a statement of thankfulne­ss, reporters obliged.

Or, should we say, obeyed.

For this, no doubt, Sanders was grateful.

Yet again, she controlled the crowd, though this time by candy-coating her usual condescens­ion with faux fellowship.

I’m thankful I wasn’t in the room.

My first impulse when someone asks me to share is to not-share. This isn’t because I’m not a sharing person, but because sharing, like charity, should be voluntary. For a press sec- retary to require profession­al journalist­s to essentiall­y beg for their supper, surrenderi­ng their adversaria­l posture like a dog commanded to Drop The Bone, is an infantiliz­ing tactic. The effect is to neutralize the opposition.

Yes, I said opposition. The press, by definition, is opposition­al. As Mr. Dooley, the turn-ofthe-century fictional bartender created by columnist Finley Peter Dunne is often paraphrase­d: “The newspaper’s job is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortabl­e.”

Yet, from the interplay between the media and the Trump administra­tion, one would think reporters were supposed to be taking dictation. Seen and not heard. Sanders routinely brushes reporters’ questions aside. During any given press briefing, one is likely to hear words to these effects:

“I think he addressed that pretty thoroughly yesterday,” she’ll say. Or, “We don’t have any announceme­nt on that.” Or my personal favorite, which came in response to a query about chief of staff and retired Gen. John Kelly’s remarks about Florida Democratic Rep. Frederica Wilson, “If you want to get into a debate with a four-star Marine general, I think that’s something highly inappropri­ate.”

If Sanders isn’t evading, she’s scolding. Like a parent weary of her 3-yearold’s constant “why?,” her tone and expression telegraph: “Because I say so.”

Sanders’ sudden shift from press secretary to minister’s daughter a few days before Thanksgivi­ng coincides with her apparent image evolution of being more-carefully coiffed, coutured and contoured with appropriat­ely profession­al makeup.

If one were Sanders’ employer, meanwhile, one surely would be pleased. She’s everything a terrible person — or, say, an unpopular president — could hope for in a public relations artist. She says nothing; gives away nothing; looks fierce and dutifully repeats falsehoods as required. Her resistance to flinching or blinking is state of the art.

Yet, even as Sanders declines to enlighten the press corps, she manages to inspire admiration for her toughness and effectiven­ess — from a certain perspectiv­e. To Donald Trump’s base, she’s the a

la mode on a slice of apple pie. Her daily humiliatio­n of the press, making them seem like churlish children, is a booster shot of “fake news” animus that also inoculates against viral truths.

To the media, she is the wall Trump promised to erect and, it seems, we are the swamp he seeks to drain. Out with the media, out with free speech, out with facts! For these purposes, Sanders is perfectly cast. Where there is the prolonged car alarm of “fake news,” there is bound to be a fake news officer. Such is not always the case. In fact, the most successful press secretarie­s were journalist­s first.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States