The Palm Beach Post

‘Peter Rabbit’ features gorgeous animation, violent mayhem

-

Hollywood studios have recently been pillaging the literary canon of beloved children’s literature, digging up fodder for animated feature films. The best of these, like the “Paddington” movies, successful­ly meld nostalgia with modern and exciting filmmaking, while the more questionab­le ones, like the recent “Ferdinand” adaptation, manage to muddle the source material with too many pop songs and dirty jokes. The new “Peter Rabbit” adaptation manages to land right in the middle — the animation technology is top-notch, but the gentle spirit of Beatrix Potter’s books is subsumed into a chaotic, violent mayhem, manically soundtrack­ed to the day’s hits.

Will Gluck directs and co-wrote with Rob Lieber this adaptation of “The Tale of Peter Rabbit,” the story of naughty rabbit Peter ( James Corden), who can’t help but snack from Mr. McGregor’s garden. This version ups the ante significan­tly in the Garden Wars, especially when Mr. McGregor (Sam Neill) dies, and his fastidious nephew Thomas (Domhnall Gleeson) comes to Windermere. Thomas, hoping to sell off his uncle’s property to fund his own toy shop, finds the “vermin” have moved in. And in fact, the anthropomo­rphized, clothes-wearing wildlife of this country village have hosted quite the produce-fueled rager in the McGregor home.

The photoreali­stic animation by Animal Logic is truly breathtaki­ng, especially in the first few moments of the film. The rabbits are extraordin­arily lifelike, with their individual

Peter Rabbit (James Corden) with Thomas McGregor (Domhnall Gleeson) in Columbia Pictures’ “Peter Rabbit.” strands of soft fur and shiny eyes. When Peter hops into the arms of neighbor Bea (Rose Byrne) for a cuddle, it’s as if she’s holding the actual animal. Gluck showcases the animated creatures with actionpack­ed filmmaking featuring sophistica­ted camera movements.

But those whiz-bang tracking shots are all put in service of a shockingly savage and brutal war between Peter and his crew (Flopsy, Mopsy, Cotton-Tail, Benjamin

Bunny) and the fussy Thomas. At first, Peter just wants to get at those sweet, sweet fruits and veggies. Then it’s simply a matter of proving he can, and ultimately, of displaced jealousy over Thomas’ budding relationsh­ip with Bea, whom Peter sees as a mother (she’s a version of a modernized Potter, talking to and painting her furry friends).

The impish Peter takes the feud entirely too far, and “Peter Rabbit” descends into a truly sadistic display of violence, as poor Gleeson is pounded, pummeled, battered, bruised, electrocut­ed and exploded at the paws of the brutal bunnies.

There’s a clever little meta streak that runs through “Peter Rabbit,” especially among the wildlife, who snark and joke and talk about their “character flaws,” make war movie references, and “pour one

out” for their fallen homie Mr. McGregor, all while bopping along to endless pop and hip-hop tunes. There’s a whole essay to be written about the cultural appropriat­ion of gangster rap symbols into this ohso-twee British property, but this is neither the time

nor place.

Ultimately, after the dust has settled, the lesson at hand is one of peaceful coexistenc­e with the environmen­t. The more you try to shut something out, with gates and fences and dynamite, the more it will try to fight back. There’s also a message about owning your actions and taking responsibi­lity… even if you are a tiny talking bunny wearing a blue jacket. But when a bunny misbehaves like Peter does, apologies are necessary all around. Perhaps even to the audience of the film.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States