The Palm Beach Post

Food box idea draws ire of Democrats, advocates

OMB chief Mulvaney likens box to meal kit delivery service.

- By Juliet Linderman

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion is pushing what it calls a “bold new approach to nutrition assistance”: replacing the traditiona­l cash-on-a-card that food stamp recipients currently get with a pre-assembled box of canned foods and other shelf-stable goods dubbed “America’s Harvest Box.”

Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney likened the box to a meal kit delivery service and said the plan could save nearly $130 billion over 10 years. But the idea, tucked into President Donald Trump’s 2019 budget, has caused a firestorm, prompting scathing criticism from Democrats and nutrition experts who say its primary purpose is to punish the poor.

“The main goal is to alleviate food insecurity, and the reason SNAP is so successful is because it gives low-income families the autonomy and dignity to make their own food choices,” said Craig Gundersen, a professor in agricultur­al strategy at the Department of Agricultur­al and Consumer Economics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Gundersen said people will leave the program as a result of the shift.

SNAP — the Supplement­al Nutrition Assistance Program — is the official name for the food stamp programs.

“All of a sudden you’re saying, ‘We don’t trust you to make the right decisions for your family.’ It’s demeaning, and it’s patronizin­g. This is pro-hunger, because people will leave the program,” Gunderson said.

Under the proposed plan, households that receive more than $90 in SNAP benefits each month — roughly 81 percent of households in the program, or about 16.4 million — would be affected.

Agricultur­e Secretary Sonny Perdue called the box “a bold, innovative approach to providing nutritious food to people who need assistance feeding themselves and their families.”

But the proposal doesn’t include any concrete details about how much the program would cost or how it would be implemente­d, saying only that states will be given flexibilit­y to distribute the boxes “through existing infrastruc­ture, partnershi­p, and/or directly to residences through commercial and/or retail delivery services.”

Lawmakers say they aren’t even sure where the idea came from.

Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., the ranking member of the House nutrition subcommitt­ee, called the proposal a “cruel joke” that came out of nowhere. He said despite having numerous hearings on SNAP, Monday’s budget was the first time he’d heard of the food box proposal.

“I don’t even know how to implement it. Who would distribute these boxes?” he said. “How would we do this? Do they anticipate recipients getting them at supermarke­ts? In addition to being a cruel and demeaning and awful idea, it’s just not practical.”

A spokeswoma­n for House agricultur­e committee Chairman Mike Conaway, R-Texas, said the committee has held 21 hearings and invited 80 experts to speak about SNAP in its preparatio­ns of the forthcomin­g farm bill, and the idea of a food box was not once discussed.

Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow, top Democrat on the Senate agricultur­e committee, said the food box idea “isn’t a serious proposal and is clearly meant to be a distractio­n from this Administra­tion’s proposed budget that fails our families and farmers.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States