The Palm Beach Post

With evangelica­ls in dither, it is time to mention Pence

- Ross Douthat He writes for the New York Times.

A few days ago, which is to say an eternity in our Trump-dilated time, there was a story on NPR about anxious evangelica­ls’ seeking a meeting with the president.

The subject of their agita, not entirely surprising­ly, was the Stormy Daniels affair, in which the president’s lawyer-fixer, Michael Cohen, appears to have averted a possible October surprise by buying the silence of a porn star (and perhaps more than one) with whom Donald Trump committed adultery shortly after the birth of his third wife’s only son.

But the prominent evangelica­ls seeking the meeting were apparently less concerned about the adultery than about the political ramificati­ons — low religious-right turnout in 2018, a defeat for Republican­s, and from there defeats on the policy issues that forced religious conservati­ves to make their peace with Trump in the first place.

The sudden investigat­ory focus on Cohen and Daniels might turn out to be a legal tempest in a D-cup. But still, for evangelica­ls concerned that their agenda is yoked so closely to the fortunes of that Hefnerian president, this seems like a good time to contemplat­e a simple question: Why not Mike Pence?

In the 2016 election, once Marco Rubio was defeated and Ted Cruz dispatched, religious conservati­ves faced a binary choice: Vote Trump or get Hillary.

But the politics of the coming year, once the Robert Mueller investigat­ion delivers whatever it’s going to deliver, might offer a very different choice. If Trump were impeached, the presidency would devolve to precisely the kind of man whom much of pre-Trump religious conservati­sm insisted that it wanted in the Oval Office: an evangelica­l Christian family man with a bluenose’s temperamen­t and a boring Reaganite checklist of beliefs.

Lots of Republican­s who once resisted the Trumpian takeover have now accepted the various narratives that cast him as an indispensa­ble man — because he’s the only Republican who knows how to fight, because his removal would be a victory for the hated establishm­ent and the even more hated media and the many-tentacled Deep State, because whatever else happens you can’t let the liberals win. And evangelica­ls have their particular version of these Trump-the-indispensa­ble conceits.

There is no way of knowing exactly what would have happened, of course, had Bill Clinton been pushed out by Senate Democrats and Al Gore installed in his place. But there are good reasons to suspect that as an incumbent steward of late-1990s prosperity untainted by his steadfast support for a lying boss, Gore would have had an easier time dispatchin­g George W. Bush in 2000, and the entire trajectory of the early 2000s would have been more favorable to Democrats. And there are also good reasons to think that profession­al feminists, who contorted themselves absurdly in defense of Clinton’s predatory conduct, would have been better off accelerati­ng their reckoning with the pigs of liberalism rather than waiting for the age of Trump and the old age of Harvey Weinstein.

Plus, there’s the providenti­al aspect. Sure, making use of Donald Trump to keep Hillary Clinton from being president is a fascinatin­g flourish by history’s Author, but the idea that the Almighty might use a porn star to make Mike Pence president represents, if anything, an even more amazing miracle.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States