The Palm Beach Post

Vulgarity goes mainstream in comic’s filthy dinner rant

- Cal Thomas He is a syndicated columnist and appears on ‘Fox News Watch.’

To be vulgar once earned societal disapprova­l, ostracism from polite company and — in my grandmothe­r’s era — put a young person in danger of having his mouth washed out with soap.

Today, vulgaritie­s are now mainstream.

Last week at the White House Correspond­ents’ Dinner in Washington, in the very ballroom where the annual National Prayer Breakfast is held, a previously obscure “comedian” named Michelle Wolf climbed out from under a rock to spew words and personal insults at President Trump, his press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and top aide Kellyanne Conway, obliterati­ng any remaining standard of conduct and decency. Wolf also made grotesque references to abortion and used words to describe in vulgar terms female genitalia.

You can look up the words. They can’t be printed in this newspaper. Doing so, however, might make you feel dirty and insulted, regardless of your political leanings. So vulgar was Wolf that Margaret Talev, president of the correspond­ents’ organizati­on, was forced to issue a statement: “Last night’s program was meant to offer a unifying message about our common commitment to a vigorous and free press while honoring civility, great reporting and scholarshi­p winners, not to divide people . ... “Unfortunat­ely, the entertaine­r’s monologue was not in the spirit of that mission.” Unfortunat­ely? By inviting Wolf, Talev should have expected what she got.

It’s difficult to pinpoint when the decline began; when journalist­s abandoned decorum and aligned themselves with people who practice their craft from the vantage point of the sewer.

I recall the 1996 Radio-Television Correspond­ents Associatio­n dinner. The main speaker was “shock jock” Don Imus. With President Clinton and the first lady sitting there, Imus delivered a series of “jokes” about the president’s sexual behavior and Hillary Clinton’s legal troubles. While I am no fan of the Clintons, I thought the routine was in poor taste.

The next day I called press secretary Dee Dee Myers and asked her if she agreed, or was I simply old and out of touch. Myers agreed the Imus routine was tasteless.

Do these correspond­ents not care what the public thinks of them? Do they have no concern for their low approval ratings and a credibilit­y level that seems to be in free fall?

People watching the dinner or reading about it must have had their own views of the “liberal media” confirmed. Sanders and Conway should have walked out. I would have laughed if they had taken their water glasses and poured them on

Wolf ’s head as they exited, but they have too much class for that.

After the 1996 dinner, the head of the TV-Radio Correspond­ents Associatio­n wrote a letter of apology to the Clintons. It’s a pretty safe bet there will be no similar letter sent to Trump or Sanders and Conway. I think it can be safely said that most in the audience and on the dais agree with Wolf, perhaps not with the vulgaritie­s, but certainly the liberal worldview she reflects.

Wolf will now likely crawl back under her rock and after her 15 minutes of fame once again become obscure, and deservedly so. If the White House Correspond­ents’ Dinner continues to embrace the low and the vulgar, it should end.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States