The Palm Beach Post

Make no mistake: Midterm vote is for or against Trump

- Thomas L. Friedman He writes for the New York Times.

With the primary season winding down and the midterms soon upon us, it’s time to point out that this election is not about what you may think it’s about. It is not a choice between the particular basket of policies offered by the candidates for House or Senate in your district or state — policies like gun control, right to choose, free trade or fiscal discipline. No, what this election is about is your first chance since 2016 to vote against Donald Trump.

As far as I am concerned, that’s the only choice on the ballot. It’s a choice between letting Trump retain control of all the key levers of political power for two more years, or not.

If I were writing the choice on a ballot, it would read: “Are you in favor of electing a majority of Democrats in the House and/ or Senate to put a check on Trump’s power — when his own party demonstrab­ly will not? Or are you in favor of shaking the dice for another two years of unfettered control of the House, the Senate and the White House by a man who wants to ignore Russia’s interferen­ce in our election; a man whose first thought every morning is, ‘What’s good for me, and can I get away with it?’; a man who shows no compunctio­n about smearing any person or government institutio­n that stands in his way; and a man who is backed by a party where the only members who’ll call him out are those retiring or dying?”

If your answer is the former, then it can only happen by voting for the Democrat in your local House or Senate race.

Because what we’ve learned since 2016 is that the worst Democrat on the ballot for the House or Senate is preferable to the best Republican, because the best Republican­s have consistent­ly refused to take a moral stand against Trump’s underminin­g of our law enforcemen­t and intelligen­ce agencies, the State Department, the Environmen­tal Protection Agency, the Civil Service, the basic norms of our public life and the integrity of our elections.

These Republican­s have made the craven choice to stand with Trump as long as he delivers the policies they like on tax cuts, gun control, fossil fuels, abortion and immigratio­n, even though many privately detest him.

I don’t write this easily. On many nonsocial, nonenviron­mental issues, I’m not a card-carrying Democrat. I favor free trade, fiscal discipline, pro-business regulation­s, a democracy-expanding foreign policy, and I have an aversion to identity politics.

But all that is on hold for me now, because something more fundamenta­l is at stake: It’s not what we do — it’s who we are, how we talk to one another, what we model to the world, how we respect our institutio­ns and just how warped our society and government can get in only a few years from a president who lies every day, peddles conspiracy theories from the bully pulpit of the White House and dares to call our FBI and Justice Department a “criminal deep state” for doing their job.

In the end, I don’t want to see Trump impeached, unless there is overwhelmi­ng evidence. I want to see, and I want the world to see, a majority of Americans vote to curtail his power for the next two years — not to push a specific agenda over his but because they want to protect America, its ideals and institutio­ns, from him — until our next presidenti­al election gives us a chance to end this cancer and to birth a new GOP that promotes the best instincts of conservati­ves.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States