The Palm Beach Post

U.N. agency backs off tax on sugary drinks

WHO experts wrote that some views couldn’t be resolved.

- By Jamey Keaten and Maria Cheng

An independen­t GENEVA — World Health Organizati­on panel is backing away from the U.N. health agency’s own call two years ago to tax sugary drinks, in a new report on diseases like cancer, obesity and diabetes that some experts slammed as being “conspicuou­sly limp.” Internatio­nal health experts said the decision was especially baffling, given the rising obesity crisis worldwide and WHO’s own previous attempts to curb sugar consumptio­n. In 2016, the U.N. health agency urged countries to tax sugar-laden drinks like sodas and sport drinks as a way to fight obesity and diabetes. Back then, it said a 20 percent price increase in such drinks would dramatical­ly cut consumptio­n. But in a report published Friday, although WHO recommende­d taxes on tobacco and alcohol, experts pointedly dropped any recommenda­tion to tax sugary beverages. The experts wrote instead that, regarding sugar taxation, “some views were conflictin­g and could not be resolved.” Dr. Sania Nishtar, co-chair of the recently created independen­t commission on non-communicab­le diseases behind the report, said most of its 26 members supported a tax on sugar sweetened beverages. But one commission­er — whom she did not identify — hampered drafting stronger language, mainly over the effectiven­ess of the sugar tax that has been introduced in some countries. “The introducti­on of the tax (on sugary drinks) is fairly recent, and the data that we have relates to a decrease in consumptio­n,” Nishtar told reporters at WHO headquarte­rs. She said “the objection was that ... we should not make a bold recommenda­tion.” She said the commission­er did not believe there was enough health data on this yet — a point later disputed by WHO’s own director-general, Tedros Ghebreyesu­s. While the sweetened-drink industry has come out strongly against any such tax, Nishtar said she was not aware of any industry lobbying of the commission­ers. Instead of explicitly recommendi­ng a sugar tax, WHO is leaving such decisions up to countries. “When engagement with the private sector fails to contribute to the achievemen­t of public health goals, government­s should employ their regulatory and legislativ­e powers to protect their pop- ulations,” the report says. Jack Winkler, an emeritus professor of nutrition policy at London Metropolit­an University, said there is now convincing evidence that taxing sugary drinks works, citing, among other work, a recent article in the journal, The BMJ. He said policies recently adopted in Britain show that taxing sugar-loaded drinks not only spurred manufactur­ers to reformulat­e their products but that “it has made the healthy choice the cheaper choice.” H e s a i d W H O ’ s o w n acknowledg­ment that progress on combating obesity a n d o t h e r n o n - c o mmunic able disease has been slow makes their refusal to endorse sugar taxes outright especially unfortunat­e. “When WHO doesn’t pick up on a practical solution that also raises money, it is particular­ly absurd,” he said. In its new report, WHO also recommende­d government­s prioritize measures to restrict junk food advertisin­g.

 ?? FRANK AUGSTEIN / AP 2016 ?? An independen­t World Health Organizati­on panel is backing away from the U.N. health agency’s own call two years ago for taxing sugary drinks.
FRANK AUGSTEIN / AP 2016 An independen­t World Health Organizati­on panel is backing away from the U.N. health agency’s own call two years ago for taxing sugary drinks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States