The Palm Beach Post

Trump tore up papers from Mar-a-Lago meetings, visits

Federal employees spend hours putting documents together.

- By Christine Stapleton

It’s become a daily White House ritual: A team of federal employees equipped with rolls of clear tape resume the ongoing, humpty-dumpty task of putting back together pieces of documents that President Donald Trump has torn up. It is a presidenti­al habit that aides have not been able to break — and which apparently extends in reach to his Palm Beach club.

Federal law requires all presidenti­al documents, from diaries to drafts of speeches to scribbled

notes, be retained, both for current reference points and for the historical record. But Trump, as laid out in a June 10 article in Politico, isn’t so committed to such record-keeping.

The political journal’s story cited two former employees who stated on the record that the president routinely tears up

documents, often shredding them himself. The employees, Solomon Lartey and Reginald Young Jr., said federal workers collect the pieces of paper from the West Wing and the president’s residence and tape the bits of paper back together to restore the historical record as completely as possible. But what happens when the president rips up documents when he is on a weekend foray to Mar-a-Lago or his Bedminster, N.J., retreat? say, on official diplomatic trips to Singapore or Canada? Is someone assigned to go through the trash and scour the floors of Mar-a-Lago for pieces of paper when the president visits his private club? It seems so, Lartey said in an interview this week with The Palm Beach Post. “I remember some paperwork coming back from Florida,” said Lartey, a former records management analyst whose job it was to tape together pieces of documents the president treated like trash. Most of the pieces were newspaper articles the president did not like — including one from a local newspaper in Palm Beach, Lartey said. Undoubtedl­y, presidenti­al business has been conducted at Mar-a-Lago, which he has dubbed the Southern White House. During his 17 visits to Mar-a-Lago, Trump ordered a missile strike on Syria and hosted two world leaders, Chinese President Xi Jinping and Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. He’s also conducted discussion­s on issues like health care for military veterans. He has hosted Cabinet members. And he has held untold numbers of informal talks with individual­s, from business CEOs to celebritie­s to advocates for all kinds of causes. Notes of those encounters, or better said, pieces of those notes, have made it back to the records team in Washington. “I don’t know who the staff member was but I’m quite sure somebody was bringing stuff back,” Lartey said. “You just couldn’t throw it away in the trash.” The White did House not respond to questions about the administra­tion’s record retention practices when the president visits Mar-a-Lago. Neither did the National Archives. Under the Presidenti­al Records Act, the White House must preserve all documents, including memos, letters, notes and emails, for possible inclusion in the National Archives. Documents are gathered, organized and assigned categories. They are then reviewed by officials at the National Archive to determine whether they qualify for inclusion in the presidenti­al archive. The records law dates to 1978, and was a measure responding to the Watergate era and the infamous Nixon White House tape recordings. In particular, one 18-minute recording that went blank. The act places responsibi­lity for the custody and management of presidenti­al records with the president himself. However, the National Archivist is tasked with reviewing presidenti­al records and determinin­g if they can be destroyed. “The originator of the document does not get to decide what’s important and not important,” said Robert K. Brigham, Boskey Professor of History and Internatio­nal Relations at Vassar College. “Especially the president.” Handwritte­n notes and doodles can show a president’s state of mind at a particular moment in history, said Elizabeth A. Cobbs, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institutio­n at Stanford. Destroying documents also raises suspicion — even if nothing nefarious is going on, Cobbs said. “The propensity to tear things up suggests secretiven­ess,” Cobbs said. “Creating a paper-trail ... that’s how we build confidence.” A memo that or note may not seem important now may have significan­ce in the future, said Lee White, Executive Director for the National Coalition for History. President Obama was very serious about keeping everything, White said. Other commanders-in-chief were not so meticulous. About 22 million emails on a private email server were lost — and subsequent­ly found — while President George W. Bush was in office. President Richard Nixon, who routinely tape recorded conversati­ons in the Oval Office, also did so when he traveled, Bingham said. “When Nixon traveled to Key Biscayne there were systems in place for capturing what happened,” Bingham said. He recorded many of his conversati­ons with Charles Greg“Bebe” Rebozo, a Florida banker and businessma­n who became infamous for being a friend and confidant of Nixon. While there are no specific procedures that a president must put in place to retain records, Bingham suspects the Trump administra­tion has done so. As for enforcemen­t of the federal records law, the National Archives, National Security Archive, watchdog groups monitor record-keeping. However, it would take action by Congress to hold the executive branch accountabl­e. Lartey, 54, had worked under several administra­tions as a records analyst but had never experience­d anything like the work he was doing taping together Trump’s ripped up paperwork. Trump tore up so many documents that Lartey and several other staffers worked full time taping together documents. “I said to myself, ‘This is like a puzzle,’ ” Lartey said. Lartey was fired on March 23. He said he was given no explanatio­n, just escorted to his car. Later, he was allowed to resign. After 30 years as a civil servant, he had planned to retire in September. He is waiting to hear if he will still receive retirement benefits. Still, Lartey said clear instructio­ns on record retention were given to the staff of the new administra­tion. But the president kept tearing up documents and articles. On some documents Lartey could see a stamp that indicated the president had seen the document. One letter, torn into small pieces, came from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — whom Trump dubbed “Cryin’ Chuck Schumer” on Twitter. “He (Trump) didn’t understand how this stuff worked,” Lartey said. “Everything is a presidenti­al record, electronic or paper.” Record keeping has been under scrutiny since the first days of the Trump administra­tion. In June 2017, two government watchdog groups sued Trump and his office, claiming White House staff violated the Presidenti­al Records Act by communicat­ing via confidenti­al encryption applicatio­ns like Signal and deleting some of the president’s messages on Twitter. That case was dismissed in March of this year. In October, Politico reported that National Archives officials had periodical­ly warned White House lawyers that the Trump administra­tion must follow document preservati­on laws.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States