The Palm Beach Post

Schools say jurors in dark on reserves

District: $88M is already earmarked for uses such as supplies and salaries.

- By Andrew Marra Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Everyone has ideas about how public schools should spend their money. Grand jurors are no exception.

More police officers. Higher salaries. New police cars. Self-locking doors.

More police dogs. More counselors. More psychologi­sts. More training. Magnetized ID cards for every student. And impact-resistant glass in thousands of classroom doors.

On Wednesday, a 21-person grand jury convened by Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg delivered 72 pages of recommenda­tions to make the county’s public schools safer. Unsurprisi­ngly, most suggestion­s required a lot of money.

District officials estimated the total price tag at upward of $50 million in annual expenses, not including millions more in onetime costs.

School administra­tors are used to lectures about how to spend the taxpayer dollars they’re entrusted with. What riled up district officials about the grand jury’s report wasn’t the recommenda­tions — many of which the district was already working to address — but

the way the jurors suggested paying for it all.

Rather than suggest new sources of money or places to cut in its existing budget, the grand jury recommende­d that the school district spend money from its reserves — pointing especially to an $88 million “miscellane­ous reserve” that the district said exists only on paper.

Administra­tors bristled at what they called a facile-sounding suggestion, saying it’s a well-known rule of thumb that government­s shouldn’t use reserve money to pay for recurring expenses like new positions and higher salaries.

“Using that money for additional headcount doesn’t make any sense to me,” Schools Superinten­dent Donald Fennoy said. “It’s not a fiscally responsibl­e thing to do. Those monies don’t come to us like that.”

Contrary to the jurors’ insinuatio­n that the district is sitting on a excessive stockpile of money, administra­tors say their $55 million “contingenc­y” reserve is lower, proportion­ally, than that of most Florida school districts, the county government and even the state government.

State law calls for school districts to stockpile the equivalent of 3 percent of their annual budget for emergencie­s, and federal guidelines for districts recommend as much as 10 percent, administra­tors said. The district said its reserve amounts to 7 percent.

“To suggest you don’t have any reserves is kind of irresponsi­ble and foolhardy,” said Mike Burke, the school district’s chief financial officer.

What most surprised district administra­tors was jurors’ and prosecutor­s’ fascinatio­n with $88 million in the school district’s budget slated as “miscellane­ous reserves.”

“There’s this $88 million reserve fund in the budget, and there are things the money can be used for during the course of the year,” Assistant State Attorney Michael Rachel said at a news conference Wednesday. “And the grand jury was concerned: Well, why isn’t this reserve budget maybe being reserved in part for the school police?”

But district administra­tors say the so-called “reserve fund” is just a place where money earmarked for other uses — like classroom supplies, teacher salaries and state-mandated school-award money — is parked until the district determines where and when it has to be distribute­d.

“These are things that are budgeted that are going to be doled out during the school year,” Burke said. “We have to hold it, so we hold it in reserve.”

Steering the money from there into the police department isn’t skimming money off an idle rainy-day fund. Using it could mean cutting teachers’ pay, removing supplies from classrooms and cutting other school functions — and, in some cases, misusing restricted state money.

“I tried to explain this (to the grand jury),” Burke added, “but it’s obvious to me after reading the report that they did not get it.”

Administra­tors said they agreed in principle with most recommenda­tions, although they said some were impractica­ble or cost-prohibitiv­e.

Fennoy said he hadn’t seen anything in the report that district officials hadn’t already weighed or considered in the months since the Parkland school shooting.

Indeed, some suggestion­s are already being implemente­d, such as the recommenda­tion to hire more officers, now mandated by state law.

The district is also planning to ask voters for a property tax increase that would generate an extra $150 million next year, much of which would be dedicated to police and safety spending.

Fennoy said the jurors’ recommenda­tions weren’t surprising. Public school financing is notoriousl­y complicate­d.

So much so, officials said, that even in a school district with a $2 billion budget, it’s very difficult to find large pots of money that aren’t already spoken for or restricted.

“It just highlights that as such a large organizati­on, (the district) is very complex,” Fennoy said.

 ?? BRUCE R. BENNETT / THE PALM BEACH POST ?? State Attorney Dave Aronberg (center) releases the grand jury’s findings. Schools Superinten­dent Donald Fennoy said he saw nothing in the report not already weighed or considered.
BRUCE R. BENNETT / THE PALM BEACH POST State Attorney Dave Aronberg (center) releases the grand jury’s findings. Schools Superinten­dent Donald Fennoy said he saw nothing in the report not already weighed or considered.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States