The Palm Beach Post

Court lets AmEx keep high-fee pacts

U.S. had sued over anti-steering deals; retailers blast 5-4 decision.

- By Greg Stohr

The Supreme Court threw out a government lawsuit that accused American Express Co. of thwarting competitio­n by prohibitin­g merchants from steering customers to cards with lower fees.

The justices, voting 5-4 along ideologica­l lines, said the U.S. government and 11 states failed to prove that the American Express rules harmed cardholder­s as well as merchants.

The case was being closely watched in Silicon Valley because of the prospect it could insulate tech giants like Facebook and Amazon.com from some antitrust suits.

The ruling preserves American Express’s high-fee business model and deals a blow to retailers looking to reduce the $50 billion in fees they pay to credit-card companies each year. It’s a defeat for Discover Card Services, which said the rules undercut its ability to compete with American Express.

Writing for the court, Justice Clarence Thomas said the government “did not offer any evidence that the price of credit-card transactio­ns was higher than the price one would expect to find in a competitiv­e market.”

American Express called the ruling a “major victory” for consumers as well as the company.

Antitrust enforcers said American Express uses its leverage over merchants to thwart competitio­n from cards that would charge retailers lower fees. American Express’s agreements with retailers contain an “anti-steering” provision that bars them from doing anything to encourage the use of competing cards, such as offering discounts.

The Justice Department and states said the effect is to ensure that retailers will continue to pay high fees and to thwart rivals like Discover.

Writing for the dissenters, Justice Stephen Breyer said American Express was demanding “contractua­l protection from price competitio­n.”

Because of the anti-steering policy, “consumers throughout the economy paid higher retail prices as a result, and they were denied the opportunit­y to accept incentives that merchants might otherwise have offered to use less-expensive cards,” Breyer wrote.

Retail groups said they were disappoint­ed.

“Today’s decision is a loss for American consumers,” said Deborah White, general counsel of the Retail Industry Leaders Associatio­n. “The court’s decision ... will allow AmEx to continue to stifle competitio­n and prevent consumers from understand­ing the cost of rising credit card fees.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States