The Palm Beach Post

Impeachmen­t over Stormy? Dream on, hypocrite Dems

- Marc A. Thiessen He writes for the Washington Post.

Michael Cohen’s decision to plead guilty for making hush-money payments on Donald Trump’s behalf has raised the prospect that if Democrats take control of Congress, they might try to impeach the president over a matter completely unrelated to a perceived criminal conspiracy with Russia. Good luck with that: Even if Democrats win back both the House and Senate, there is zero chance a two-thirds majority of senators will convict President Trump for paying off an adultfilm star.

It would be the height of hypocrisy if Democrats tried to remove the president over allegation­s of illegality relating to extramarit­al affairs. During the Monica Lewinsky scandal, congressio­nal Democrats told us the private sexual conduct of a president does not matter, and that lying under oath to cover up a “consensual relationsh­ip” is not an impeachabl­e offense.

Today, Democrats are outraged and appalled when Trump attacks special counsel Robert Mueller and calls his inquiry a “witch hunt.” But back then, then-Sen. Joe Biden called the Starr investigat­ion ... wait for it ... a “witch hunt.” Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., declared Starr was “out of control” and accused him of having a “fixation of trying to topple the president of the United States.”

The fact is, Democrats were not alone in their concern that an investigat­ion into Whitewater morphed into a perjury probe against Clinton for lying about his relationsh­ip with Lewinsky. Many Republican­s agreed that independen­t counsels had too much power.

So in 1999, the GOP-controlled Congress, in its wisdom, let the independen­t counsel law expire. We were promised that investigat­ors answerable to the Justice Department would be more focused on their original purpose.

Well, it seems like we’re right back where we started. Federal prosecutor­s were supposed to be investigat­ing Russian collusion. Instead, we have an inquiry into the Trump Organizati­on’s finances and whether Trump’s payments to Stormy Daniels violated campaign-finance laws. Both might be worthy of scrutiny but at least under the precedent Democrats set during the 1990s, they are not grounds for impeachmen­t.

If Democrats do try to impeach Trump over anything but a criminal conspiracy with Russia, they will regret it. The president was legitimate­ly elected by Americans who knew about his lecherous past and supported him anyway. Indeed, Trump’s election was a direct result of the Democrats’ victory in the culture war of the 1990s. Republican­s are now simply playing by the rules Democrats establishe­d. Millions of Americans absorbed the lesson that Clinton and his Democratic enablers taught us — that a president’s “personal stuff,” as Pelosi put it, does not matter — and chose Trump.

This does not mean Trump is out of the woods legally. Once he leaves office, Trump may have to face consequenc­es for anything illegal he might have done.

If Mueller finds conclusive evidence that Trump entered into a criminal conspiracy with Russia, then by all means impeach away.

But absent such evidence, the idea that Stormy Daniels is going to bring down Trump is a liberal fantasy. If Democrats are upset that they cannot remove Trump over this, well, sorry — they set the precedent.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States