A ticking time bomb
Michael Roizen, M.D. and Mehmet Oz, M.D.
When “The Tick” premiered on Amazon in 2016 it seemed unlikely that the public would bite. But with 10 more episodes slated for 2019, it looks like The Tick, a super-resistant superhero who dresses in a tick costume, has taken up residence in enough TV-viewing homes to be a keeper. Ticks are like that.
Areas with specific tick infestations are expanding. In the past 13 years, the number of reported tick-borne diseases has more than doubled in the U.S. You may be familiar with some of them, such as Lyme disease. But, from 2004 through 2016, seven new tick-borne germs that can infect people have been identified.
On top of that, some ticks are especially fond of your pets. One example is the so-called dog tick, which carries Rocky Mountain spotted fever. A recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report identified a new variety — the brown dog tick — that’s sickened untold dogs and 4,000 folks since 2008 in Mexicali, a city on the southern side of the U.S.-Mexico border. As this critter migrates northward and indoors, it’s spreading a Rocky Mountain spotted fever infection that’s more aggressive than the standard American dog tick’s.
So whether you are in the Southwest, a mountainous region, New England or the upper Midwest, you need to protect yourself from ticks:
■ Use an Environmental Protection Agency-registered insect repellent (think DEET); find one at EPA.gov.
■ Outside, wear longsleeved shirts and long pants. Put DEET on your clothes, too.
■ Examine yourself carefully whenever returning indoors, especially your legs.
■ Examine pets daily and remove ticks carefully with tweezers.
A mudslide of bad news about vaping
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire — and then, after wildfires, often come the rains and all-too-lethal mudslides. Well, the same is true for vaping. It turns out that mudslides of information are piling up about the serious health problems associated with firing up e-cigs.
At first, no one was sure if vaping was bad for you, at least compared with smoking tobacco. In the 2010 movie “The Tourist,” Frank ( Johnny Depp) says, while smoking an e-cigarette, “It delivers the same amount of nicotine, but the smoke is water vapor.” But inhaling any batch of ignited chemicals is destructive to lung tissue — and we’ve been warning you about the hazards for years.
Well, it’s even worse than we thought: New research from the U.K. shows that not only does vaping cause destructive lung-cell inflammation, it also can shut down your lungs’ protective cells that ward off bacteria and allergens (researchers used the phrase “impaired bacterial clearance”).
Plus, research recently presented at the American Chemical Society says that e-cigs can damage DNA in your oral cells, upping your risk of mouth and throat cancers! And then there’s mounting evidence that vapers have double the risk of heart disease and heart attack compared with people who don’t smoke anything. Cigarette use triples the risk. And yet another study found that people who used e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes daily (many do) were five times more likely to have a heart attack than those who had never used either.
So there you have it. Where there’s smoke, well, you know the rest.
Glyphosate in the food chain; carbs in your diet Question:
I read that the weed killer glyphosate — the one found responsible for causing cancer in that groundskeeper in California — is showing up in breakfast cereals. How do I keep this out of my house? — Anthony B., Brownsville, Texas
Answer: First of all, Anthony, don’t panic just because glyphosate is a controversial subject. Many organizations, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institutes of Health, and of course the manufacturer Monsanto, believe glyphosate and its branded weed-killer Roundup are safe. In 2001, the Agricultural Health Study found “no statistically significant associations with glyphosate use and cancer.” Currently the Food and Drug Administration allows a “fair amount” of glyphosate in several processed foods, because they don’t think it’s harmful.
However, there’s that verdict in the $289 million lawsuit leveled against Monsanto and, according to The New York Times, more than 5,200 additional suits are in the pipeline. They’re telling a different story, one echoed by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (part of the World Health Organization), which classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans.”
Recently the Environmental Working Group found elevated levels of glyphosate in 31 of 45 test samples of conventionally grown oats in granola, oat breakfast cereals and snack bars. Even if levels in one sampled product are not necessarily going to cause you harm, the EWG warns that repeated exposure to glyphosate starting in childhood and lasting for decades could be harmful.
Roundup is the mostused herbicide in the
U.S. It’s on neighborhood lawns and genetically modified crops that have been made “Roundup-ready” to resist glyphosate. Everything it’s sprayed on, such as weeds, that haven’t been genetically altered dies. Glyphosate is also sprayed on non-GMO crops so they die, dry out and get harvested sooner.
To read the EWG’s report — and see what foods tested positive and negative for glyphosate — go to EWG.org and search for glyphosate. Then you can see what products you might want to avoid. But remember, a lot more research needs to be done.
Q: My sister just finished a month of a very low carb diet and lost about 15 pounds. She looks great, but says she is pretty worn out. There’s nothing wrong with a diet like that, is there? — Betty L., Ronkonkoma, New York
A: Well, not knowing more about your sister’s health, we can’t really say how it affected her for good or bad. What we can tell you is that recently a large, long-term study done by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston looked at the dietary carbohydrate intake of 15,428 adults between 45 and 64 years old. The participants self-reported their carb intakes between 1987 and 1989. Researchers then followed up 25 years later.
The study found that people whose carbohydrate intakes made up less than 40 percent of their diets and those whose diets were 70 percent or more carbohydrate-based were at the greatest risk of dying over that time period. A total of 6,283 of the 15,428 participants had died after 25 years, so the researchers had quite a group to analyze. The least risk of dying was among those folks whose diets were made up of 50 to 55 percent carbohydrates.
Still, the real story for longevity may be about where the carbs come from and what people eat in place of carbs when they restrict their intake. The researchers found that mortality risks increased when dietary carbs were replaced with (and increased intake of ) animal fats and proteins. On the other hand, mortality rates decreased when the carbs were plant-based instead of from processed foods like white breads, pastas, snacks and sweets.
So whether you are trying to lose weight or stay healthy, stick with seven to nine servings of fresh fruits and vegetables daily; eat 100 percent whole grains, nuts (walnuts and almonds) and legumes. You’ll get the right amount of fiber and other carbohydrates, and protein, too.