Email suggests Army still trying to discharge immigrant recruits
Dave Philipps BOSTON — The Army’s abrupt discharges of immigrant recruits may not be over after all.
Faced with legal challenges from some of the recruits, who said they had been expelled unfairly on specious security grounds, the Army suspended the discharges over the summer and said it would re-examine its policy.
But an internal Army email message obtained by The New York Times suggests that the Army may be looking for different grounds for expelling the recruits that would sidestep the litigation.
The recruits had signed up for a program known as Military Accessions Vital to National Interests, or MAVNI, which offered legal immigrants with vital language or medical skills a fast track to citizenship in exchange for military service. About 11,000 troops have joined the armed forces through the program since MAVNI started in 2008.
The Defense Department ended the program in 2016, citing security, and imposed strict new screening on thousands of recruits who already signed enlistment contracts for the program but had not yet begun basic training. The Army flagged many of them as security risks, even when other federal agencies had cleared them for more sensitive jobs in the civilian world.
One was Igor Gavrish, 24, a Russian immigrant who passed stringent background checks to work with deadly viruses in a lab where he must have his iris scanned twice to gain entry. He tried to join the Army Reserve, but the Army classified him a major security risk.
Another immigrant from Russia, Pavel Astashkin, was classified as potentially too risky, even though he is an airline pilot who has passed several federal security checks and regularly flies over the White House and the Pentagon.
“It makes no sense,” said Gavrish, “The Army recruits us for our foreign ties, then refuses to use us because of them.”
Declassified counterintelligence reports show that the security threats the Army thought it saw in the recruits were often ordinary aspects of immigrant life, like sending money or regularly telephoning relatives overseas.
A group of recruits sued the Army this summer, saying they were being unfairly discharged. The Army suspended the discharges and said it planned to “conduct a review of the administrative separation process.”
The internal Army email suggests that the Army has been using the time since then to have military lawyers pore through the immigrant recruits’ records, looking for possible crimes that could be used to force them out.
The email, sent to lawyers in the Army Reserve in mid-August, asked for volunteers to search the recruits’ security files “to determine whether the applicants admitted to or provided information about a crime.” The email was forwarding a request from the 902nd Military Intelligence Group, the unit in charge of vetting MAVNI recruits.
The email did not say how the information would be used. But it noted that the recruits “are currently suing the federal government claiming they were wrongfully discharged from the Army,” and suggested that during security interviews, the recruits may have “confessed to a crime.”
Charging MAVNI recruits with crimes would let the Army force them out quickly regardless of the legal challenges over background checks.
“This is alarming — they are just going on a fishing expedition,” said Margret D. Stock, a lawyer and former Army Reserve lieutenant colonel who helped create the military’s immigrant recruit program. She now represents several MAVNI recruits. “The Army got called on the carpet in court for doing arbitrary and irrational security screenings, and so it started looking for a new way to kick these guys out.”
Allegations of illegal conduct could be used as grounds for discharge, even if formal charges are never filed, Stock said.
Lawyers from Fried Frank, the law firm representing the recruits who are suing the Army, declined to comment.
Asked about the email, a Defense Department spokeswoman denied that the purpose of the legal reviews of the recruits’ records was to force them out of the service. The spokeswoman, Maj. Carla Gleason of the Air Force, acknowledged that any recruits who were linked to crimes would be discharged, but she said the reviews were routine checks to ensure that reporting guidelines had been followed.
“Any inference that this was an attempt to charge or discharge MAVNI candidates would be inaccurate,” Gleason said. The major said the legal reviews requested in the email were canceled a few days after the order went out.
Stock said she believed there had since been additional emails of a similar nature requesting legal reviews. Gleason said she was not aware of any additional emails.
The major said that stringent vetting of noncitizen recruits was vital, because some recruits in the MAVNI program had been linked to foreign intelligence agencies. But she declined to give any specifics, saying the information was classified.
Gleason said the Defense Department did not know of any soldiers in the program who had been publicly charged with offenses related to terrorism or espionage.
Most recruits in the MAVNI program came to the U.S. on student visas. Many have multiple graduate degrees, and they are, on average, better educated, better behaved and better performing than the typical soldier, according to a 2017 RAND Corp. report. One MAVNI recruit was the Army’s soldier of the year in 2012.
Though MAVNI recruits typically must enlist in low-level jobs that do not require a security clearance, they are put through all the background checks required for top-secret clearance, including a review of years of finances and travel and several lengthy interviews.
“I’ve been through so many screenings, they know me better than I know myself,” said Astashkin, the pilot, who lives in Chicago.