The Palm Beach Post

Judge restores protection­s for grizzlies; Rockies hunts halted

- By Matthew Brown

BILLINGS, MONT. — The first public grizzly bear hunts in the Northern Rockies in almost three decades have been blocked by a U.S. judge who rejected government claims that the fearsome predators had recovered from near-exterminat­ion.

U.S. District Judge Dana Christense­n ordered federal protection­s restored on Monday for more than 700 bruins in and around Yellowston­e National Park.

Wyoming and Idaho were on the cusp of allowing hunters to kill up to 23 bears this fall — the first planned hunts in the U.S. outside Alaska since 1991.

The ruling was condemned by state officials who spent months planning the hunts, but there was no immediate word on whether an appeal seeking to overturn the ruling would be filed.

Christense­n wrote in his ruling that the case was “not about the ethics of hunting.” Rather, he said, it was about whether federal officials adequately considered threats to the species’ long-term recovery when they lifted protection­s last year.

In the judge’s view, the answer was no.

He noted that an estimated 50,000 bears once roamed the contiguous U.S. and said it would be “simplistic at best and disingenuo­us at worst” not to consider the status of grizzlies outside the Yellowston­e region, one of the few areas where they have bounced back.

Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead said the ruling provided further evidence of flaws in the Endangered Species Act and the need for Congress to make changes.

“Grizzly bear recovery should be viewed as a conservati­on success story,” Mead said in a statement.

A bid to remove protection­s for the region’s gray wolves ran into similar legal problems last decade. In that case, Congress intervened in 2011 to strip safeguards from the animals in Montana and Idaho through legislatio­n, opening the way to public wolf hunts.

Pressure to lift protection­s on bears and allow hunting has increased in recent years as the number of conflicts between bears and people increased. Most of those conflicts involve attacks on livestock but occasional­ly bears attack people, such as a Wyoming hunting guide killed earlier this month by a pair of grizzly bears.

The ruling marks a victory for wildlife advocates and Native American tribes that sued when the Interior Department revoked federal protection­s. They argued that the animals face continued threats from climate change and loss of habitat.

Tim Preso, an attorney with Earthjusti­ce who represente­d many of the plaintiffs, said Christense­n’s ruling made clear that the government had moved too hastily to remove protection­s because bears are absent from much of their historical range.

“Putting the blinders on to everything other than Yellowston­e grizzlies was illegal,” he said. “We tried to get them to put on the brakes, but they refused to do that.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States