The Phoenix

Voters demand participat­ion in Pa. redistrict­ing

-

“Goofy Kicking Donald Duck” is getting the last laugh.

That, of course, is the ridicule heaped on the monstrosit­y that was the 7th Congressio­nal District. The bizarre shaped district was a result of the 2011 redistrict­ing process, performed by Republican­s who control the state Legislatur­e. They bent, contorted and twisted the 7th District to the point it was touching on five different counties, stretching from King of Prussia to Reading.

Incumbent Republican 7th District U.S. Rep. Pat Meehan then promptly rolled to huge wins in three successive elections, routinely racking up 60 percent of the vote. That was the whole idea behind the process, to twist and distort it to the partisan advantage of Republican­s, in particular incumbents. Areas of GOP strength were included, while Democratic-leaning regions were excised.

Eventually the Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court intervened. They ruled the redistrict­ing process performed in 2011 a classic example of a partisan gerrymande­r – with the 7th District being Exhibit A. Not only that, but they threw out the old Congressio­nal map and drew up one of their own. It will be in place for the May 15 primary.

The high court treated one symptom, but they didn’t cure the disease.

The disease is called politics, and how it pollutes too much of our democratic process. In this instance, it takes the basic tenet of democracy, the voice of voters in selecting their elected representa­tives, and stands it on its head.

The answer is to get politics out of the equation, to take the crucial task of drawing up congressio­nal districts out of the greedy finger of politician­s who clearly can’t help themselves when it comes to bending things to their advantage.

Rep. Steve Samuelson, D Northampto­n, introduced a bill that would create a citizens’ redistrict­ing commission that would be tasked with drawing the new maps based on the results of the census.

But politics – at least the kind practiced in Harrisburg – is a funny business..

When the bill finally came up in the House State Government Committee, politics reared its ugly head again. Committee Chairman Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Butler, with no public hearing, and barely a word of public debate, put up an amendment that basically neutered the legislatio­n. Instead of getting an 11-member commission made up of voters from the two major parties as well as lesser-known parties, Metcalfe instead created a six-member panel of legislator­s, with control again residing with the majority party.

Fair Districts PA, the group that has pushed long and hard to take politics out of this equation, called the Metcalfe maneuver “a blatant attempt to bypass the public interest in an independen­t commission.”

Metcalfe’s amended version passed the committee on a straight party-line vote. But the chairman never released it to the full House, which means the House never got the chance to amend it back to something akin to its original intent.

All of this comes as a poll sponsored by the Pennsylvan­ia Budget and Policy Center, Common Cause Pa, Why Courts Matter – Pa., and the League of Women Voters shows a majority of Pennsylvan­ians want meaningful change when it comes to the redistrict­ing process.

Sixty-eight percent of respondent­s said they support an independen­t commission to draw district lines. Of those 55 percent strongly support the change. Only 22 percent indicated they wanted the job to remain in the hands of politician­s.

Hope for meaningful change is not dead yet. A similar bill is making its way through the Senate. Outraged House Democrats went on something of a legislativ­e rant, producing more than 80 bills they say have been bottled up in the State Government Committee for little reason other than Metcalfe’s whim. They urged Republican House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, to assign them to other committees where they might stand a chance of seeing the light of day.

Pennsylvan­ia voters deserve meaningful change when it comes to the political chicanery known as gerrymande­ring. Metcalfe clearly is standing in the way of that change.

Pennsylvan­ians want this process taken out of the hands of politician­s.

“Goofy Kicking Donald Duck” may be gone, but it’s not forgotten.

And no one is laughing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States