The Phoenix

McCarthy is the ultimate survivor

-

They say if you don’t succeed, then try, try again. Even if it means taking 15 tries to get it right.

And that’s exactly what Republican Congressma­n Kevin McCarthy did, across four long days, to finally win the House Speakershi­p.

It was a bruising battle for McCarthy, an embarrassm­ent for the party, and set the stage for what could be the most tumultuous congressio­nal session in quite some time.

Much has been made that the 15 ballots were the most in a century. Prior to this year, 13 of the 14 votes for Speaker that required multiple ballots occurred prior to the Civil War. But hey, it didn’t take 133 ballots, as in 1855. At least that’s something.

Bottom line: Whether or not Kevin McCarthy proves to be an effective leader won’t be because he endured four days of bad publicity where monikers of “embarrassm­ent” and “humiliatio­n” dominated coverage. In other words, colleagues won’t walk down the Capitol corridors and say “hey, there’s the guy who needed fifteen votes to become Speaker.” Instead, it will be “there’s Kevin McCarthy, Speaker of the House of Representa­tives and second-in-line to the Presidency” — and while he won’t be able to corral votes at will, House members will view him with respect. And with respect comes power.

As Mr. McCarthy closed in on the magic number but was still coming up short, there were reports of near-fisticuffs on the House floor. Watching the video, that was an overblown assessment.

Frustratio­ns flare and tempers triumph during such tense times, so it is a testament to members that those emotions did not spill into violence. Those with the distinctio­n of serving in Congress have a responsibi­lity to set an example for the nation. While the House has a more raucous history than the genteel Senate, its members must always remember that even the most strident cacophony of disagreeme­nt must start and end with only words — and that civility should always win the day.

Let’s keep things in perspectiv­e. Sure, powerful committee assignment­s and effective party organizati­on are front-and-center during tumultuous organizati­onal votes, but in the end, that’s all just inside-the-Beltway politics. They don’t matter in the grand scheme, since the business of running the country will always move ahead, with or without specific individual­s holding Speaker and committee gavels.

If a majority of Republican­s wanted McCarthy to lead them, that’s certainly their prerogativ­e. But criticizin­g those who opposed him was likely counterpro­ductive. Sure, not having a smooth transition is a headache for leadership, and it can make the party look disorganiz­ed. But members who don’t toe the line shouldn’t be chided. A party that prides itself on being a “big tent” should be tolerant of dissenting views within that party.

Some McCarthy supporters stated that he earned the job. But what does that mean? Yes, he worked his way up the ranks and has represente­d the party well over the years, but hard work is not an automatic qualifier for an elected position. Many candidates who’ve lost at the ballot box worked harder than their opponents, yet still lost.

The only way to earn an elected position is to earn enough votes to get there. Coronation­s have no place in American politics — especially inside the halls of Congress.

Congress hasn’t exactly been a model of function and effectiven­ess — the border is in severe crisis; America’s debt exceeds $31 trillion; runaway spending continues unabated; energy independen­ce no longer exists; and our infrastruc­ture remains subpar, to name just a few.

With that in mind, some of the concession­s that McCarthy made are a step in the right direction, such as a 72-hour period for legislator­s to read bills before voting on them; individual appropriat­ion and single-subject bills that will lessen wasteful spending on non-relevant issues; germanenes­s requiremen­ts on amendments; and pledges to vote on term limits and border security.

The bigger question is why these issues weren’t addressed during times when Republican­s had larger House margins and controlled both the Senate and White House.

If the GOP agenda becomes primarily focused on politicall­y-oriented investigat­ions rather than addressing the bread-and-butter issues facing Americans, they will have a tough time remaining in power, rendering the entire Speaker fight pointless.

They would do well to recall the words of Michael Douglas in The American President: “We have serious problems to solve, and we need serious people to solve them.”

Good luck and Godspeed, Speaker McCarthy.

 ?? ?? Chris Freind
Chris Freind

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States