The Punxsutawney Spirit

Wisconsin’s conservati­ve high court hands GOP another weapon

- By Todd Richmond

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin’s conservati­ve-controlled Supreme Court handed Republican­s their newest weapon to weaken any Democratic governors in the battlegrou­nd state, ruling this week that political appointees don’t have to leave their posts until the Senate confirms their successor.

The court’s decision — in the case of a conservati­ve who refused to step down from an environmen­tal policy board for more than a year after his term expired — marks another loss for Democratic Gov. Tony Evers as he faces reelection in November. Republican­s have worked to reduce Evers’ powers since even before he took office and have refused to confirm many of his appointees. This week’s ruling gives them the ability to block them simply by declining to hold a nomination vote.

“Most people on the street would say when a term ... expires, there’s an opening. The Supreme Court has said that commonsens­e understand­ing is not right,” University of WisconsinM­adison political science professor Barry Burden said. The ruling “raises the question of why is there a term at all? Maybe we just say a person serves for life the way a U.S. Supreme Court justice does.”

Republican­s are likely to control the Legislatur­e for years to come largely due to gerrymande­red districts.

After Evers was elected in 2018 but before he took office, they passed laws during a lame-duck session that temporaril­y stripped him of his power to appoint members of the state’s economic developmen­t agency and gave legislator­s the ability to block executive branch agencies’ rules and policies.

So far, the Senate has refused to confirm about 42 percent of Evers’ 299 appointees, according to Evers’ office. What’s more, the Senate took the rare step in 2019 of voting not to confirm Evers’ agricultur­e secretary, Brad Pfaff, after Pfaff criticized GOP lawmakers for not providing enough money to help farmers with mental health problems. Pfaff had to step down.

The struggle over appointmen­ts took a turn in the spring of 2021 when Fred Prehn’s term on the Department of Natural Resources policy board ended. Evers appointed his successor, a move that would have given his appointees a one-member majority on the board and his administra­tion the power to shape environmen­tal policy.

Prehn, who was appointed by former Republican Gov. Scott Walker, refused to step down. He has since cast the deciding vote to increase the quota for the state’s wolf hunt and to scrap limits in well water on a group of chemicals known as PFAS, an abbreviati­on for perfluoroa­lkyl and polyfluoro­alkyl substance,

Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul sued to force Prehn off the board. The state Supreme Court’s four-justice conservati­ve majority ruled Wednesday that a vacancy must exist before a governor can fill it — and that a “vacancy” occurs only if the incumbent dies, resigns or is removed for misconduct.

The decision essentiall­y prevents a governor from replacing the previous governor’s appointees without Senate confirmati­on.

The ruling left Democrats stunned.

“Today, I remind the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the Republican Party of this state that we do still live in a democracy, a very basic function of which is the peaceful and respectful transfer of power, even — and most especially — when you lose,” Evers said. “(His appointees) should be considered on their merit, and should have the opportunit­y to serve the people of our state, regardless of whether or not they were appointed by a Democrat or share the same ideas as Republican­s in the Legislatur­e.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States